Date: Mon, 7 Mar 94 04:30:05 PST
From: Advanced Amateur Radio Networking Group <tcp-group@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: TCP-Group-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: TCP-Group Digest V94 #61
To: tcp-group-digest
TCP-Group Digest Mon, 7 Mar 94 Volume 94 : Issue 61
Today's Topics:
Index
TCP-Group Digest V94 #59
Wampes, Linux and a packet><internet gateway???
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu>.
Subscription requests to <TCP-Group-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>.
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 1994 19:32:08 +0000
From: Stu Mitchell <stu@lab.r1.fws.gov>
Subject: Index
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu
I'm trying to get my JNOS (v1.10 just released version from
ftp.ece.orst.edu) bbs to forward to our local bbs. But I
get some strange things.
I logged in from the console as wd4eck and sent a message to wb7awl@w7oek.
Then I quit the bbs and issued a mb kick command to force a forward. The
message goes out OK, but it doesn't get erased from the w7oek.txt file.
If I issue another mb kick, the message goes out again!
In my FORWARD.BBS file:
w7oek
ax25 2m w7oek
w7oek
-------
I don't have w7oek.ampr.org defined in my domain.txt because I don't want
to use tcp/ip to interface with w7oek.
In the log file it says:
01:44:45 W7OEK on port 2m - MBOX bbs mail sent: SP wb7awl @ w7oek <
wd4eck $48_WD4ECK
01:44:45 W7OEK on port 2m - user w7oek: error 4
opening /nos/spool/mail/w7oek.idn
The index file in /nos/spool/mail has a suffix .ind not .idn, but even if
I rename it to w7oek.idn, I still get the error.
I'm also envoking nos by changing into the c:\nos directory and issuing a
nos -dc:\nos command. So the root should be c:\nos.
My gut feel tells me I have some sort of permission error. I tried
entering w7oek in the ftpusers file as 8199 and 8195 because that was the
only place I could think of that had permissions. There isn't a Index
reference in the nos.cfg file either.. so does anybody know what's going
on?
Thanks!
===========================================================================
= Stu Mitchell - Technical Support Section Chief, USFWS Forensic Lab =
= stu@ash.lab.r1.fws.gov or mitchellstu@fws.gov | This is only =
= [ When in doubt, mumble, when in trouble, delegate!] | my opinion! =
===========================================================================
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 1994 15:16:46 CET
From: "Jack Stiekema" <JACK@vic1.victron.nl>
Subject: TCP-Group Digest V94 #59
To: KCALEWINE@delphi.com
>>Date: Sat, 05 Mar 1994 02:24:18 -0500 (EST)
>>From: KCALEWINE@delphi.com
>>Subject: PA0GRI v2.0p and PPP
>>To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu
>>KA9Q NOS. Specifically, even though PPP is specifically mentioned mentioned in the docs,
>>it does n PPP does not appear to be incli uded in this particular version of
>>the software. Slip LIP is there, but no PPP.
Recompiling the source code will help.
The original sourcecode of Phil contains also PPP.
B.t.w. something wrong with your link to ucsd.edu?
Kind regards,
Jack Stiekema
+----------------------------------------------------+
| Victron bv POB 31 9700 AA Groningen Holland |
| phone: +31 50 446222 fax: +31 50 424107 |
| home: +31 5980 80498 pe0mot@pe0mot.ampr.org |
+----------------------------------------------------+
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 1994 21:51:06 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Mr N Mercer" <eia027@cent1.lancs.ac.uk>
Subject: Wampes, Linux and a packet><internet gateway???
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu
We have just set up a gateway in our area, using Linux and Wampes. We
have 2 ports, one ethernet onto the local network, and the other a 9k6
radio link. What I really need info on, is setting up the routing betwwen
Wampes and the ethernet side?? We can telnet ok to Wampes, and login etc, the
n telnet out onto the internet ok from there. What I would like to do is set
up some encap routes from our 44 Wampes address to other ampr addresses?
If anybody is running a similar setup, can you please email me, I am
at my wits end with this! Please do not respond to list, as I am not
subscribed yet!
Thanks in advance,
eia027@cent1.lancs.ac.uk
------------------------------
End of TCP-Group Digest V94 #61
******************************
******************************