Date: Tue, 18 Jan 94 04:30:02 PST
From: Advanced Amateur Radio Networking Group <tcp-group@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: TCP-Group-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: TCP-Group Digest V94 #14
To: tcp-group-digest
TCP-Group Digest Tue, 18 Jan 94 Volume 94 : Issue 14
Today's Topics:
9600b settings
More Wampes & Ethernet
TNC 3
TNOS for dial-up
TNOS Missing Function (4 msgs)
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu>.
Subscription requests to <TCP-Group-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>.
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 94 06:20:27 CST
From: Jack Snodgrass <kf5mg@kf5mg.ampr.org>
Subject: 9600b settings
To: tcp-group mailling list <tcp-group@ucsd.edu>
I've just got a 9600b link going between my home station and another PC. I'm
going to put one of the 9600b radios on our local gateway. I've got a couple
of questions.
1). Anyone have a simplex, 2 mtr freq that they're using for 9600b?
Suggestions will be appreciated. I'm looking for a clear spot in the
145.50 - 145.80 range. We're using 145.67 for 1200b TCP/IP.
2). What settings ( TCP, AX.25, and PARAM ) settings should I use? I'm
using a TNC-2 clone with a PacCom, 9600b modem. I haven't upgraded
the TNC to a 10mhz version, but I'll do that at some point in the
near future. I played with some setting and got a FTP transfer of
a 6K file to go a 240cps. I get 50cps with 1200b so I was expecting
something like 400 - 500cps with 9600. Any 9600b pointers would be
appreciated.
73's de Jack - kf5mg
Internet - kf5mg@kf5mg.ampr.org - 44.28.0.14
AX25net - kf5mg@kf5mg.#dfw.tx.usa.noam - home (817) 488-4386
Dialup - kf5mg@tcet.unt.edu - work (looking for)
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 94 11:46:20 MET
From: jgrau@rigel.etse.urv.es
Subject: More Wampes & Ethernet
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu
Dieter Deyke said to me "WAMPES wil NOT talk directly to the ethernet
interface card, this is the job of the UNIX networking kernel".
I know it Dieter. When i run WAMPES on a RISC 6000 machine and do
"ifconfig" command the "en0" (ethernet card) don't apear. SO what's happen??
How to configure the WAMPES program to reconize the ethernet card?
May be with the command "start tcpgate ..." as say Brandon S. Allbery.
Yes i have de aix tcp/ip run.
Or using AIX device drivers ... where can i get it?
Or may WAMPES can not be a gateway to internet-packet radio (listening
ethernet card & packet radio).
I've got a gateway internet<->packet radio (on prove) using WNOS on a PC,
i would like to use the UNIX's power to this gateway running WAMPES but i have
problems ...
Thanks a lot.
Curro eb3aod
e-mail : jgrau@rigel.etse.urv.es
packet : eb3aod@ea3rdt.eat.esp.eu
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 94 12:07:12 MST
From: w6swe@w6swe.tapr.org (Bob Nielsen)
Subject: TNC 3
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu
There have been several messages recently regarding a "TNC 3". I have
actually seen reference to two devices under this name. The first was
a prototype built by NJ7P and N7LEM, which was demonstrated at the 1993
TAPR annual meeting. This was built to demonstrate a revision to the
AX.25 protocol.
The other device referred to as TNC 3 appeared in an article in TAPR's
Packet Status Register (PSR) in the Fall, 1993 issue. This is a
MC68302-based design by DG8GAD and DL1GJI, which is available from
SYMEK GmbH, Johannes-Kraemer-Str 34, D-7000 Stuttgart 70, GERMANY.
------------------
Bob Nielsen, W6SWE Internet: w6swe@tapr.org
Tucson, AZ AX.25: w6swe@wb7tls.az.usa.na
Amateur IP: 44.124.12.16
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 94 20:39:00 -0000
From: mikebw@bilow.uu.ids.net (Mike Bilow)
Subject: TNOS for dial-up
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu
Cc: nos-bbs@hydra.carleton.ca
TNOS files are posted for download at N1BEE BBS, +1 401 944 8498.
Modem speeds to 14400 bps V.32bis and 16800 bps HST are supported.
These files are also file requestable over Fidonet from 1:323/107.
help100a.zip On-line help for TNOS100A.EXE
help100b.zip On-line help for TNOS100B.EXE
tnos100a.exe TNOS 940116v1.00(large) from Brian Lantz, KO4KS
tnos100b.exe TNOS 940116v1.00(small) from Brian Lantz, KO4KS
tnos100d.zip TNOS 940116v1.00 docs
tnos100e.zip TNOS 940116v1.00 support programs
tnos100s.zip TNOS 940116v1.00 source
You need 'd' and 'e,' and either the 'a' set or the 'b' set.
-- Mike
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 1994 10:04:26 -0600 (CST)
From: ssampson@sabea-oc.af.mil (Steve Sampson)
Subject: TNOS Missing Function
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu
Just a quick note about the TNOS upload to ucsd.
System: BC++ 2.0
Memory: 622k
Error: Not enough memory to compile mailbox.c
Fix: Split mailbox.c into mailbox.c and dosend.c
add dosend.c to servers.tl and makefile.
Error: TASM under BC++ 2.0 can't do USE16
Fix: Change to ".MODEL LARGE,C"
Error: fingerd.c won't compile if SCREENSAVER undefined.
Fix: Change SCREENSAVER on line 19 to TUTOR
Error: Missing function _dos_getfileattr() for MS-DOS in
main.c reqsvr.c and mailbox2.c
Fix: gave up at this point, can't compile as distributed, missing function.
---
73, Steve N5OWK
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 94 14:49:37 CST
From: mfoster@amoco.com (Michael H. Foster)
Subject: TNOS Missing Function
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu
----- Begin Included Message -----
>From owner-tcp-group@UCSD.EDU Mon Jan 17 14:28:08 1994
Sender: tcp-group-relay@UCSD.EDU
Subject: TNOS Missing Function
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu
Steve, N5OWK writes:
Fix: gave up at this point, can't compile as distributed, missing function.
> ---
Is there any kind of minimum requirements for this stuff? Do we need 486dx-66
with lots of memory to compile and run it if one could get by the missing function?
-Mike, wa5txx
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 94 18:55:37 CST
From: Jack Snodgrass <kf5mg@kf5mg.ampr.org>
Subject: TNOS Missing Function
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu
Steve - n5owk writes:
> Just a quick note about the TNOS upload to ucsd.
>
> System: BC++ 2.0
Maybe I've got my versions mixed up, but isn't BC++ 2.0 really out of date?
I thought that BC++ 3.1 was the prefered version.
> Memory: 622k
> Error: Not enough memory to compile mailbox.c
Are you running make with the -s option to take MAKE out of storage? That might
do the trick. Also check out the 'x' versions of the compiler and see if you
can run with EMS storage.
73's de Jack - kf5mg
Internet - kf5mg@kf5mg.ampr.org - 44.28.0.14
AX25net - kf5mg@kf5mg.#dfw.tx.usa.noam - home (817) 488-4386
Dialup - kf5mg@tcet.unt.edu - work (looking for)
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 94 20:46:57 EST
From: ron@chaos.eng.wayne.edu (Ron Atkinson N8FOW)
Subject: TNOS Missing Function
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu
So far I can get the default config.h that comes with it to compile. Every
other combination that I have tried (like one's that I NEED) usually get
errors in the convers and mailbox sources. Looks like it's going to take
a while to get the source to compile with the many different configurations
that everyone runs. JNOS was like this a while back too.
Ron N8FOW
------------------------------
End of TCP-Group Digest V94 #14
******************************
******************************