Date: Thu, 26 Aug 93 04:30:06 PDT
From: Advanced Amateur Radio Networking Group <tcp-group@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: TCP-Group-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: TCP-Group Digest V93 #219
To: tcp-group-digest


TCP-Group Digest            Thu, 26 Aug 93       Volume 93 : Issue  219

Today's Topics:
                       9.6KB radio mod question
                                 FYI
                        IP encap under WAMPES
                             subscribe me
                               Waaahh!!

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu>.
Subscription requests to <TCP-Group-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>.
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.

Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 25 Aug 93 17:21:05 MDT
From: jr@upl.com (J.R. Westmoreland)
Subject: 9.6KB radio mod question
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu

Does anyone know of a mod for the IC3200A dual band radio that will
allow me to connect a 9600 baud TNC?

A group here in the local area are going to go to 56KB sometime soon but there is some
discussion of waiting until next spring to make that change.  How much expense would there be in
going to 9600 now and then going to 56KB later?
How expensive are the TNC equipment for 9600?  It looks like 600 to 800 for the
56KB equipment.

Thanks,
J.R. Westmoreland (N7MFF)

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 25 Aug 93 15:25:22 EDT
From: crompton@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL (D. Crompton)
Subject: FYI
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu



------------------------------

Date: Wed, 25 Aug 93 17:16:17 MDT
From: jr@upl.com (J.R. Westmoreland)
Subject: IP encap under WAMPES
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu

I have WAMPES running on my machine and I would like to use
ip encapsulation facility.  Could someone tell me how to setup this facility?

I have a slip session connected to my machine on the internet and WAMPES
is running on the other serial port connected to the radio.  I also have an ethernet interface in the machine.
SLIP addres: 131.219.36.1
AMPR.ORG address: 44.40.4.1
Ethernet address: 131.219.99.1

Is it possible to tell WAMPES to route to the other interfaces?
If so, How?

Thanks,
J.R. Westmoreland  (N7MFF)

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1993 19:13:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Hauan <hauan@panix.com>
Subject: subscribe me
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu

Please add my name to the distribution list -- Thanks!

73 de Mike, kd2zo

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1993 22:32:11 +0200
From: wtpz2234@servus.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Subject: Waaahh!!
To: mwestfal@silicon.csci.csusb.edu, tcp-group@ucsd.edu



------------------------------

Date: (null)
From: (null)
Forget the fax The Internet has gone 
Corporate

Businesses are logging on to the communications
 system in a big way. Move over, computer nerds.

By Carla Lazzareschi
LOS ANGELES TIMES

So what if it lacks the cachet of 90210? Who cares that the 
neighborhood is still full of nerds? An address on the Internet is the 
latest gotta-have status symbol in corporate America. Once the 
hidden preserve of academics, scientists and defense contractors, the 
Internet-that grand global network of computer networks--is now 
the site of a cyberspace land rush, with businesses pouring onto the 
system in something resembling a digital stampede.

In the process, the computing world's closest thing to a 
countercultural stomping ground is being transformed into a 
communications link for corporate America--much to the displeasure 
of many longtime users. Thanks mostly to businesses, a system that 
already reaches 15 million people worldwide is growing at the rate of 
about a million a month. An estimated 6,S00 U.S. companies, 
including more than half the Fortune 1,000, subscribe to 
telecommunications services that give them an Internet mail drop, 
and more companies are gaining full access all the time.

------------------------------

Date: (null)
From: (null)
Yesterday, the country's third-biggest cablecompany, Continental 
Cablevision in Boston said it would become a pipeline for Internet. 
Continental has 2.9 million subscribers. The rush for Internet access 
has been so great in recent months that some companies, including 
Miller Brewing Co. and retailer Nordstrom Inc., have reserved 
Internet addresses for potential future use.
     
"Remember when a fax machine seemed an option? Now  everyone 
has one. The same holds true today for a corporate Internet address," 
says Christopher Locke, a software engineer and former editor of the 
Internet Business Journal. "Companies that have no presence inthis 
new arena will quickly fade from view" That may be hyperbole, but 
there's no denying the growing importance of the Net or the broad 
implications of its rising use. For any user with a personal computer 
and a modem, the Internet offers cheap, global communications.

You can use it to send a fax to Finland or locate the works of Shake-
speare. You can talk to fellow orchid fanciers, find a fiance or 
publish your memoirs. There are perhaps 4,500 special-interest 
conferences-from autos to Unix, Anne Rice to Elvis. Electronic mail 
on the Internet can be had for less than $10 amonth through a 
commercial service. Individuals can get access to the whole system 
for less than $20. Businesses, by contrast, pay from $1,000 to 
$300,000 a year, depending on their type of connection and the 
services they use.

Navigating the system isn't easy. Written by the computer literate tor 
their own ilk, the required sequences of keyboard entries are arcane 
and difficult. As a result, the Internet long remained out of the reach 
of the uninitiated. But over the last three years, a few entrepreneurs 
have made it easier for corporations and individuals to connect to 
and find their way around the system. Businesses, many of them now 
loaded with university graduates who obtained Internet addresses in 
the 1980s, have responded enthusiastically. "The Internet is still a 
long ways from being a resource for the masses says Vinton Cerf, the 
computer scientist credited with developing the Net's technology. 
"But it still is the closest thing we have to an advanced public-data 
network."

Indeed, the Internet is a prototype for the so-called information high-
way touted by two of its more recent subscribers: President Clinton 
and Vice President Gore. From its earliest days, no idea or creation 
has been deemed too outlandish or extreme to be denied access. As a 
result, the Net has attracted an eclectic community of subscribers 
whose interests and pursuits range from cutting-edge medicine to 
pornography, from nuclear arms to cartoons, from the latest stock 
market maneuverings to the hottest nightclub in New York.

Along the way, the Internet has developed what has been described 
as a "culture of remote intimacy," with users employing the system to 
share work with far-flung colleagues, and with on-line discussion 
groups chatting electronically about a mind-boggling array of 
subjects. But with the stampede of corporate America, that culture is 
shifting. Clashes have erupted between the Net's traditional 
users--who-built the system based on trust and a mutual interest in 
research--and businesses, for which the interest is more capitalistic.

To be sure, mundane electronic chitchat still accounts for most of the 
network's traffic. But business subscribers increasingly turn to the 
Net to handle some of their most critical corporate communications. 
That the communications are so important points to what is perhaps 
the largest single concern among corporate users--the security risk 
posed by connecting their computers to public-data networks. Using 
the Internet as an entry point, hackers have roamed through--and 
sometimes vandalized--corporate databases. Even sophisticated "fire 
wall" software used to seal off internal company computers from the 
Internet isn't completely hacker-proof.

Equally vexing is the need to encrypt data transmissions to ensure 
privacy during their brief electronic journey. That creates obstacles 
for multinational companies operating in multiple foreign languages 
and limited by strict export controls on American encryption 
technology.

Finally as with any new communications medium, the complex legal 
and ethical issues surrounding copyright ownership of materials 
flowing across the Net's networks must be resolved.

------------------------------

End of TCP-Group Digest V93 #219
******************************
******************************