Date: Tue, 20 Jul 93 04:30:06 PDT
From: Advanced Amateur Radio Networking Group <tcp-group@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: TCP-Group-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: TCP-Group Digest V93 #185
To: tcp-group-digest


TCP-Group Digest            Tue, 20 Jul 93       Volume 93 : Issue  185

Today's Topics:
                       JNOS 1.10x5 LZW problem

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu>.
Subscription requests to <TCP-Group-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>.
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.

Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 19 Jul 93 19:21:04 BST
From: john@its.bt.co.uk
Subject: JNOS 1.10x5 LZW problem
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu

Hi,

Can anybody answer this question. Either mail the reply to me or sent
it to tcp-group and I can forward the reply.

John

--- Forwarded mail from g7lob@gb7lob.#11.gbr.eu

Date: 18 Jul 93 14:41:00 UTC
From: g7lob@gb7lob.#11.gbr.eu
To: tcpip@gbr
Subject: JNOS 1.10x5 .. LZW problem.

R:930718/1441Z @:GB7LOB.#11.GBR.EU [TCP/IP Gateway] #:4681 $:4681_GB7LOB

From: G7LOB@GB7LOB.#11.GBR.EU
To  : TCPIP@GBR

Hi all,
  I am trying out JNOS 1.10x5 here  and have (I think) established the cause of
what was for me a major problem.
  I run JNOS  in a DesqView  window, along with  FBB, and they  forward to/from
each other internally via a BPQ  switch. Despite having loaded the whole  world
into high memory and compiled JNOS with  only the bits I find I really need, on
startup I have around 100k of  free memory (coreleft as indicated by the latest
JNOS on the  prompt line); this  free memory falls  rapidly as NOS  establishes
itself.. then stays stable at around 40-50k ((or it does now!!)).
  With  smtp LZW  compression enabled,  I was  finding thatwhen  my  FBB-system
received a  bundle of  bulletins/messages from  the NTS all together, they were
forwarded to JNOS (BBS-forwarding) where the  were then put into the smtp queue
for  rewrite/alias/onward  smtp transmission.  Seemingly  the  LZW  compression
routines were swallowing up every last bit (byte?) of free memory, such that if
I did an 'smtp kick', the repeatedly hit the return key, I could watch the free
core memory shrink down.. 20k..10k..2k..512bytes.. 10 bytes (honest!) **CRASH**
  Obviously the 'memory threshold' setting  (16384 on here) was unable  to stop
the smtp (or LZW compression) process from grabbing this memory.
  I have now turned LZW compression  off ("smtp sendlzw off : smtp reclzw off")
and the problem seems to have  disappeared.. in addition the processing of  the
messages  seems  much  faster   (maybe  that's  obvious!)..  The   only  slight
disadvantage now is that eavesdroppers can read all our smtp mail!.

  I am  a (so-called!)  'C' programmer,  but seldom  get time  to delve  deeply
enough into the  NOS sources to  even attempt to  debug this one! .. Maybe this
problem  has  already  been  identified  (and a fix posted??) on the Internet??
Maybe  someone  with  internet  access  can extract the relevant bits from this
message and post it??

George, G7LOB, sysop @ GB7LOB.#11.GBR.EU
TCP/IP BBS GB7LOB-5 on 144.625MHz [44.131.3.110]


--- End of forwarded message from g7lob@gb7lob.#11.gbr.eu


-- 

+------------------------------------+------------------------------------+
+                Work                +             Play                   +
+ Internet:  jvt@its.bt.co.uk        + Internet: john@its.bt.co.uk        +
+                                    + Amprnet:  john@g4rev.ampr.org      +
+                                    + BBS:      G4REV@GB7LOB.#11.GBR.EU  +
+------------------------------------+------------------------------------+
+                             Intel free zone                             +
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+

------------------------------

End of TCP-Group Digest V93 #185
******************************
******************************