Date: Mon, 24 May 93 04:30:08 PDT
From: Advanced Amateur Radio Networking Group <tcp-group@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: TCP-Group-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: TCP-Group Digest V93 #133
To: tcp-group-digest


TCP-Group Digest            Mon, 24 May 93       Volume 93 : Issue  133

Today's Topics:
                                CSLIP
                        CSLIP on AX.25 frames?
                             Thenet X-1H

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu>.
Subscription requests to <TCP-Group-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>.
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.

Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon May 24 11:37:04 1993
From: iiitac@pyr.swan.ac.uk
Subject: CSLIP
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu

CSLIP won't help very much in that its designed to do header (not data)
compression. It has several drawbacks

o   It needs quite large (in PC NOS terms) tables to track the compressed
headers.

o   It compresses message headers not the packet data. This is at its best
with things like telnet down a slow serial line. 

o   Only some packet headers are compressed. In paticular many types of
resend (common on radio alas) are not compressed.

It may help in places - ack frames will be smaller in paticular.

Alan

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 13 May 93 10:05:28 +1000
From: wkt@csadfa.cs.adfa.oz.au (Warren Toomey)
Subject: CSLIP on AX.25 frames?
To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu

All,
 I had this idea last night, why not use Van Jacobsen TCP/IP header
compression on AX.25 frames. Obviously, as an AX.25 interface isn't point
to point, a machine would need structures for every destination that it is 
TCP connected to. Apart from that, I can't see any major obstacles.

Comments? I think it would be very useful on slow speeds ( < 9.6kbps).

Once AX.25 code becomes available for 386bsd/BSD386/Net-2, I'll modify the
existing cslip code and try it out.

Cheers all,
  Warren

------------------------------

Date: 24 May 93 08:30:36 EET-2EEST
From: "Markus Lamminmaki OH6LSA"  <MARKUS@TECHNIS.vtyh.fi>
Subject: Thenet X-1H
To: makinc@hhcs.gov.au

>Is anyone using this software?
>
>We're trying to get it running and are having some problems.
>
>
>Mainly, it seems to be trying to use some sort of bogus digipeater address
>when repeating IP frames.  We've added ARP entries but they don't seem to
>be recognised!  Is there some magic incantation or dance ritual to perform?

Yep, there is a patch to Thenet X-1H that fixes this problem. Don't
have it handy right now but I can send you the patched version if you
like.

---
Vasa Polytechnic                 Email: markus@ygdrasil.vtyh.fi (NeXT Mail)
PB 6, SF-65201, FINLAND                 markus@technis.vtyh.fi  (PMail)
Fax: +358-61-3230 610                   OH6LSA@OH6RBV.FIN.EU    (Packet)
Home:+358-61-3211 194            Work:  +358-61-3230 661
              Looks great on the outside, but Intel inside.

------------------------------

End of TCP-Group Digest V93 #133
******************************
******************************