Date: Sun, 13 Mar 94 04:30:02 PST
From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <info-hams@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: Info-Hams-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Info-Hams Digest V94 #283
To: Info-Hams


Info-Hams Digest            Sun, 13 Mar 94       Volume 94 : Issue  283

Today's Topics:
                        FT-530 Receive Proble
                           noise blankers 

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Info-Hams-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.

Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available 
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sat, 12 Mar 1994 19:46:00 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!comstar!bob.hinkle@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: FT-530 Receive Proble
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

S>Organization: California Technology Project of The Calif State Univ

S>I tried the two freq. on my 530 and it did the same thing.  On the 440
S>side it acted like it was receiving a signal.  Very strong, with not much
S>noise behind it.


S>--

Our local ham store (North Olmstead Amateur Radion Depot, North Olmsted
Ohio ) stated last week that they automatically return all 530s to Yaesu
for the mod to cure this. They install it free and turn the radio around
in less than a week.

....Bob KA1RI/8

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 13 Mar 94 07:50:15 GMT
From: netcomsv!netcomsv!skyld!jangus@decwrl.dec.com
Subject: noise blankers 
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

In article <2lu9dt$t8o@oak.oakland.edu> prvalko@vela.acs.oakland.edu writes:

  > Well, as the guy who first called the Ten Tec noise blanker a decorative
  > knob... I'd like you all to know I happily sold my TS-440s and kept the
  > Corsair because the Corsair was a much, much better, functional RADIO!

  Ya know, it absolutly amazes me the lack of quality that hams will put up
  with in a radio as long as it a.) looks spiffy and b.) they know someone
  else that made the same mistake (er ah... choice. Yeah, that's it)

  Kenwood for years has been pulling the game of adding noise to the front
  end and cutting off the lowend audio response so the radio "sounds hot".
  And a little under dampening in the CW filter makes a pleasant ringing
  tone that just "jumps out of the QRM". Ya gotta love it! (It only takes
  a handful of parts to make a receiver that's just on the verge of self-
  oscillation. You really don't need to spend $2K plus.)

  But the DX Hogs (oops, I mean emergency preparedness types) around here
  with the Ultra-2K amps and 80 foot towers swear by them for snagging that
  rare one. (er I mean passing health and welfare traffic).

  "QRZ county, your supplies are on the truck, 59 LA qsl?"

 Amateur: WA6FWI@WA6FWI.#SOCA.CA.USA.NA  |  "You have a flair for adding
Internet: jangus@skyld.grendel.com       |   a fanciful dimension to any
 US Mail: PO Box 4425 Carson, CA 90749   |   story."
   Phone: 1 (310) 324-6080               |            Peking Noodle Co.

------------------------------

End of Info-Hams Digest V94 #283
******************************
******************************