Date: Mon, 7 Mar 94 11:42:56 PST From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <info-hams@ucsd.edu> Errors-To: Info-Hams-Errors@UCSD.Edu Reply-To: Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu Precedence: Bulk Subject: Info-Hams Digest V94 #258 To: Info-Hams Info-Hams Digest Mon, 7 Mar 94 Volume 94 : Issue 258 Today's Topics: 400 Hz xtal ladder filter, help. (2 msgs) ARRL--->Online Repeater directory Honda ignition recall - now NOISE!! IMPORTANT NOTICE IPS Daily Report 05 03 94 Kep data and INFO Keyboards at testing sessions Mini antenna response summary Print up your own log sheet(s) PY0FM and 6Y5IC Shuttle Retransmissions TS830M + CW narrow. Possible? Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu> Send subscription requests to: <Info-Hams-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu> Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu. Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams". We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 7 Mar 1994 02:51:55 GMT From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!raffles.technet.sg!ntuix!ntuvax.ntu.ac.sg!asirene@network.ucsd.edu Subject: 400 Hz xtal ladder filter, help. To: info-hams@ucsd.edu Hi, My homemade QRP xcvr has a 600 Hz BW xtal ladder filter consisting of 4 12.0000 MHz xtals. However I still find it hard to work pile-ups due to insufficient selectivity. I am planning to change it to 400 Hz. Does anyone know how much improvement I can expect to see? Also, how can this be done in the easiest way? Do I need to add xtal stages or just change to capacitor values? 72 es 73, Daniel ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Mar 1994 14:02:33 GMT From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!news.intercon.com!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!arrl.org!zlau@network.ucsd.edu Subject: 400 Hz xtal ladder filter, help. To: info-hams@ucsd.edu asirene@ntuvax.ntu.ac.sg wrote: : Hi, : My homemade QRP xcvr has a 600 Hz BW xtal ladder filter : consisting of 4 12.0000 MHz xtals. However I still find it hard to : work pile-ups due to insufficient selectivity. I am planning to : change it to 400 Hz. Does anyone know how much improvement I can : expect to see? Also, how can this be done in the easiest way? Do : I need to add xtal stages or just change to capacitor values? You probably won't see any improvement in the pileups. I am assuming that lots of stations want to work Singapore (9V1 for DX types). Problem is, most are probably calling on the same frequency (within 100 Hz), so a tighter filter won't help. What will help is to have an RIT control and continually vary your frequency receive frequency over a narrow frequency range, perhaps a kHz or two. However, 12 MHz ECS clock crystals sold by Digi-Key do make nice Cohn filters. Use 3 crystals and 470 pF capacitors. The input inpedance and output impedance just happen to be close to 50 ohms. (Some people just get lucky). Cascading two of them, I got a 3 dB BW of 379 Hz and a 6 dB BW of 427 Hz. Finally, since you asked, adding more filters will improve the skirt selectivity, making stations out of the passband weaker. 4 crystals is probably OK for a CW rig, though I use 6 in one rig and 7 in another. Increasing the capacitor values will decrease the bandwidth, but will also decrease the impedance. Impedance matching is important to maintain the proper filter shape. -- Zack Lau KH6CP/1 2 way QRP WAS 8 States on 10 GHz Internet: zlau@arrl.org 10 grids on 2304 MHz ------------------------------ Date: 2 Mar 94 20:09:07 GMT From: digex.net!digex.net!not-for-mail@uunet.uu.net Subject: ARRL--->Online Repeater directory To: info-hams@ucsd.edu sbaker@umassmed.UMMED.EDU (Stephen Baker) writes: >for such a directory, (maps aside). I wonder if they have priviledged access to >this information These and the other questions you raise are answered in other posts. -- rec.nude: your exit to good living along the Information Toll Road. finger bote@access.digex.net for PGP key and an operator will help you. Only 32 days until Opening Day! ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Mar 1994 15:12:20 GMT From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!ulowell!wang!news@network.ucsd.edu Subject: Honda ignition recall - now NOISE!! To: info-hams@ucsd.edu baxter@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Kirk Baxter) writes: >I had this recall work done on my car a couple of weeks ago, and now have >terrible ignition noise on 2 meters and 440. My condolences. As the owner of a fuel-injected 89 Accord, I've been living with this same problem for 5 years. Your posting was a big help because it points the finger at the igniter. I've tried ferrites on cables and grounding the hood to the body with little effect. Now I have something else to work on :-). According to my shop manual and electrical manual, the igniter is a solid-state module, mounted on the distributor, which acts to control current in the primary of the ignition coil. In other words, it is the solid-state equivalent of breaker points. I can only assume that your new module has sharper switching edges or a higher breakdown voltage than the old one and is creating more RFI because of this. There is a suppression capacitor in the circuit, but it has quite long leads. In fact the coil primary circuit on my car runs from the coil to the distributor and is separated by about 2 feet of cable. Probably makes a fine antenna. Ferrites on the cable didn't seem to help, but I'll probably try it again. This is not a piece of circuit I want to mess with very much. Placing additional capacitors and such in the circuit might lead to poor ignition performance or igniter failure. One piece of good news is that the interference is awful just after a major tune-up and fades gradually over the next month to a much lower level. Perhaps they replaced the igniter as part of some of my tune-ups. I'll have to pull my service slips and check them. My guess is the igniter degrades with time either from the high temperatures or the high voltages. With any luck you will also encounter this phenomenon. Ron ------------------------------ Date: 2 Mar 94 13:19:04 GMT From: agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!paris.ics.uci.edu!news.claremont.edu!kaiwan.com!wetware!spunky.RedBrick.COM!psinntp!psinntp!laidbak!tellab5!jwa@ Subject: IMPORTANT NOTICE To: info-hams@ucsd.edu 3-2-94 CORRECTIONS In the March 94 issue of QST "Packet Perspective" Stan Horzepa WA1LOU wrote an article about the Hamblaster. I would like to make this correction The Address should have been Jack Albert (WA9FVP) 203 York Pl. New Lenox, Il 60451 Ph (815)-723-6564 The address in my signature file (below) is my work QTH. Tellabs Operations Inc. does not manufacture and is not involved with the research and development of the Hamblaster. All inquires should be sent to the address above. --- Jack Albert WA9FVP Fellow Radio Hacker Tele (708) 378-6201 Tellabs Operations, Inc. FAX (708) 378-6721 1000 Remington Blvd. jwa@tellabs.com Bolingbrook, IL 60440 ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 5 Mar 1994 23:25:13 GMT From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!sserve!usage!metro!ipso!rwc@network.ucsd.edu Subject: IPS Daily Report 05 03 94 To: info-hams@ucsd.edu IPS RADIO AND SPACE SERVICES AUSTRALIA Daily Solar And Geophysical Report Issued at 2330 UT 5 March 1994 Summary for 5 March and Forecast up to 8 March IPS Warning 7 was issued on 02 March and is still current. ----------------------------------------------------------- 1A. SOLAR SUMMARY Activity: very low Flares: none. Observed 10.7 cm flux/Equivalent Sunspot Number : 096/043 1B. SOLAR FORECAST 06 March 07 March 08 March Activity Very low Very low Very low Fadeouts None expected None expected None expected Forecast 10.7 cm flux/Equivalent Sunspot Number : 095/041 1C. SOLAR COMMENT None. ----------------------------------------------------------- 2A. MAGNETIC SUMMARY Geomagnetic field at Learmonth : quiet until last period when active levels were observed. Estimated Indices : A K Observed A Index 4 March Learmonth 09 3222 1124 Fredericksburg 05 03 Planetary 08 04 2B. MAGNETIC FORECAST DATE Ap CONDITIONS 06 Mar 30 Active to minor storm. 07 Mar 30 Active to minor storm. 08 Mar 20 Active. 2C. MAGNETIC COMMENT The forecast increase in activity did not occurr, however an increase in activity is still expected over the next few days. 3A. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION SUMMARY LATITUDE BAND DATE LOW MIDDLE HIGH 05 Mar normal normal normal PCA Event : None. 3B. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION FORECAST LATITUDE BAND DATE LOW MIDDLE HIGH 06 Mar fair poor poor 07 Mar fair poor poor 08 Mar normal fair poor 3C. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION COMMENT Forecast degradations did not eventuate, However degraded HF comms are still expected over the next few days. ----------------------------------------------------------- 4A. AUSTRALIAN REGION IONOSPHERIC SUMMARY MUFs at Sydney were about 15% above predicted monthly values T index: 76 4B. AUSTRALIAN REGION IONOSPHERIC FORECAST DATE T-index MUFs 06 Mar 60 About 15% above predicted monthly values. 07 Mar 30 Near predicted monthly values. 08 Mar 30 Near predicted monthly values. Predicted Monthly T Index for March is 40. 4C. AUSTRALIAN REGION COMMENT Expected degraded HF comms did not eventuate, however it is still expected that conditions will become degraded over the next few days. -- IPS Regional Warning Centre, Sydney |IPS Radio and Space Services email: rwc@ips.oz.au |PO Box 5606 tel: +61 2 4148329 |West Chatswood NSW 2057 fax: +61 2 4148331 |AUSTRALIA ------------------------------ Date: 7 Mar 94 17:55:18 GMT From: news-mail-gateway@ucsd.edu Subject: Kep data and INFO To: info-hams@ucsd.edu Haven't seen any Keperlerian (?) data and information on current Shuttle flight. Could someone provide to the net? Tks, Larry Carr carrl@gordon-tsd1.army.mil ------------------------------ Date: 7 Mar 1994 15:09:55 GMT From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!jericho.mc.com!fugu!levine@network.ucsd.edu Subject: Keyboards at testing sessions To: info-hams@ucsd.edu In article As4@cbnewsm.cb.att.com, hellman@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (eric.s.hellman) writes: -->In article <2MAR199408091550@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov>, stocker@nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov (ERICH FRANZ STOCKER) writes: -->At our VE sessions we always check the copy whenever the applicant fails -->to answer 7 questions correctly. We once has a case where someone got only -->6 correct but had sufficient copy to pass and had correctly copied the -->answer to one of the questions not answered! There is nothing about this -->test which implies _______ (fill in the blank). -->Now don't get me started about the multiple guess test. --> -->Shel Darack WA2UBK dara@physics.att.com --> We do the same, however in all fairness we believe that if the applicant wants to submit for 1 minute solid copy, he must do so *before* getting the multiple choice test. This is because many words in the exam answers are in the text (obviously). The candidate can then back-fill his copy sheet. Then he really did not *copy* that stuff from the cw qso. Once he gets the multiple choice test sheet, I feel that the candidate should not be allowed to submit his sheet for 1 minute copy. In the case of 5wpm, there are only 25 words in the 5 min QSO.(+/-) When you give him the test sheet, you just gave him at least 10 of the words! --- ------------------------------------------------------------ Bob Levine KD1GG 7J1AIS VK2GYN formerly KA1JFP levine@mc.com <--Internet email Phone(508) 256-1300 x247 kd1gg@wa1phy.ma <--Packet Mail FAX(508) 256-3599 ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Mar 1994 13:47:49 GMT From: netcomsv!netcom.com!wy1z@decwrl.dec.com Subject: Mini antenna response summary To: info-hams@ucsd.edu Thanks for all the suggestions. The overwelming response was to get the Comet CH-32 Mini antenna (1.75 "). Price is ~$34 My check went into the mail this morning to HRO. Again, thanks. Scott -- =============================================================================== | Scott Ehrlich Amateur Radio: wy1z AMPRnet: wy1z@wa1phy.ampr.org | | Internet: wy1z@neu.edu BITnet: wy1z@NUHUB AX.25: wy1z@wa1phy.ma.usa.na | |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Maintainer of the Boston Amateur Radio Club hamradio FTP area on | | the World - ftp.std.com pub/hamradio | =============================================================================== ------------------------------ Date: 7 Mar 94 14:08:48 GMT From: nprdc!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!ulowell!wang!dbushong@network.ucsd.edu Subject: Print up your own log sheet(s) To: info-hams@ucsd.edu The following Word for Windows document is a one-page log sheet that you can use in case you use up the last page of your log and need one in a hurry, or in case you don't log QSOs often enough to justify purchasing a logbook. Feel free to customize it for your needs. 73, Dave KZ1O begin 664 logpage.zip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end -- Dave Bushong, Wang Laboratories, Inc. ------------------------------ Date: 7 Mar 1994 14:25:48 GMT From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.umbc.edu!haven.umd.edu!cville-srv.wam.umd.edu!ham@network.ucsd.edu Subject: PY0FM and 6Y5IC To: info-hams@ucsd.edu Worked PY0FM and 6Y5IC yesterday during ARRL SSB DX contest. Anyone know: 1) PY0FM - which island group, and how to get a card? 2) 6Y5IC - any special route to get a card? Thanks everybody! -- 73, _________ _________ The \ / Long Original Scott Rosenfeld Amateur Radio NF3I Burtonsville, MD | Live $5.00 WAC-CW/SSB WAS DXCC - 125 QSLed on dipoles __________| Dipoles! Antenna! ------------------------------ Date: 7 Mar 1994 07:42 EDT From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!paladin.american.edu!zombie.ncsc.mil!cs.umd.edu!news.gsfc.nasa.gov!nssdca.gsfc.nasa.gov!stocker@network.ucsd.edu Subject: Shuttle Retransmissions To: info-hams@ucsd.edu As you may know GARC volunteers undertake to retransmit Shuttle Ground transmissions. Please note the following: INTERESTED IN SHUTTLE TRANSMISSIONS The Goddard Amateur Radio Club (GARC)invites interested people to tune in to Shuttle transmissions. As a public service to the Amateur radio community, the GARC retransmits space shuttle air-to-ground communications. During the STS-62 mission, Amateur radio operators, shortwave listeners, and those individuals with scanners can listen to these communications on the following HF (single side band) and VHF frequencies: 3.860 MHz (lower sideband) 7.185 MHz (lower sideband) 14.295 MHz (upper sideband) 21.395 Mhz (upper sideband) 28.650 Mhz (upper sideband) and 147.45 Mhz (FM) Local DC Metro Area 73 de N3OXM Erich GARC Public Info Coord ------------------------------ Date: 7 Mar 94 11:58:59 GMT From: news-mail-gateway@ucsd.edu Subject: TS830M + CW narrow. Possible? To: info-hams@ucsd.edu Hello, I'm wondering if anybody can help me. I'd like to install a CW narrow filter on a Kenwood TS830M although the factory says that it's not possible. I don't care doing it in the hard way even putting a switch in the rear panel or doing some mods on the board itself but I want to hear from someone who attempted this before to be sure that it's feasible since I still have to buy the rig. The more info you guys can give me the better it is. Thank you! Marco aa1iu/ix1iiy -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marco Fassiotto | Voice : +39-125-524650 | ham : ix1iiy/aa1iu System Software Engineer | Fax : +39-125-524294 | pkt : ix1iiy@ik1brm Laser Printers | Data: +39-125-524374 ------------------------ Olivetti | Internet : fax@sparc4.ico.olivetti.com | fax%sparc4@olivetti.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Mar 1994 06:39:53 GMT From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!msuinfo!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!trlluna!titan!pcies4.trl.OZ.AU!drew@network.ucsd.edu To: info-hams@ucsd.edu References <CLMqI7.Bvn@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, <9402271401591.gilbaronw0mn.DLITE@delphi.com>, <2l3360$4jr@news.acns.nwu.edu>du.a Subject : Re: Electric Fence RFI In article <2l3360$4jr@news.acns.nwu.edu> lapin@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Gregory Lapin) writes: >From: lapin@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Gregory Lapin) >Subject: Re: Electric Fence RFI >Date: 2 Mar 1994 22:15:28 GMT >In article <9402271401591.gilbaronw0mn.DLITE@delphi.com>, >Gilbert Baron <gilbaronw0mn@delphi.com> wrote: >>>I've got some bad interference on 80 through 10 >>>meter bands from an electric fence about 500 >>>feet away. The effect is very sharp clicks >>>about 3-4 per second. Analog noise blanker >>>works some but not 100%. >>> >>>Anyone have any cures? >>> >>>Tnx, >>>Ned Hamilton, AB6FI >>> >> >>Well, if you ground the fence, case closed. >> >> Gil Baron, El Baron Rojo, W0MN Rochester,MN >> "Bailar es Vivir" >> PGP2.3 key at key servers or upon request >> > >Just my curiousity about the fence: Are we talking about a real >electrified fence or is this what is commonly called an "invisible fence" >that send out a weak rf signal, received by a pet's collar to create a >shock when the pet tries to cross the "fence"? > >Greg KD9AZ Grounding the fence may not help. An electric fence (of the conventional kind) can be thought of as a capacitor which must be kept charged. The "pop" noise (about every second) that we sometimes hear is the harmonic energy in the steep waveform needed to charge the capacitance of the fence wire. If there is a fault (such as grass or other material touching the wire) the thing will radiate the more effectively. "Rural" hams know about this problem. 73, Drew, VK3XU ------------------------------ Date: 2 Mar 94 20:03:55 GMT From: digex.net!digex.net!not-for-mail@uunet.uu.net To: info-hams@ucsd.edu References <1994Feb27.133807.12203@ke4zv.atl.ga.us>, <rcrw90-280294091343@waters.corp.mot.com.corp.mot.com>, <YEE.94Feb28192017@mipgsun.mipg.upenn.edu> Subject : Re: On-line Repeater Directory yee@mipg.upenn.edu (Conway Yee) writes: >The various threads on this issue have been highly supportive of the >idea of the online repeater directory. For this, I am grateful since >there are people appreciate the work that the volunteers and I have >put into the project. If the ARRL is listening, it can readily tell >the attitudes of most hams here. Further, a number of more >industrious hams are supplementing my efforts to the league and I am >grateful for their assistance. I am still hopeful of a satisfactory >resolution to this issue. As of this moment, I have not heard any >further news from the league itself. (I don't know why I am jumping into this morass, but...) Conway Yee and I discussed this subject via email some weeks ago. This current discussion seems to be based on conjecture and speculation. The ARRL is not the source of the repeater information. The area coordinators are the sources of the compiled information. Having seen the data that is sent to the ARRL, I can confidently say that the effort of Bart Jahnke at the ARRL is minimized, since the regional coordinators must supply the data to the ARRL in a format almost identical to that which appears in the Repeater Directory. The ARRL simply appends the data together and voila! a Repeater Directory. Further, since I am now designing and implementing a computerized information system for T-MARC (welcome to the 1980s!) I am happy to report that T-MARC is implementing an "ombudsman" to verify the accuracy of its own data. The ombudsman will take the list of repeaters and verify that each one is on the air. This is where the "time and effort" come in, and it is a good thing since frequencies are getting scarce in the Washington Baltimore area. So, if an on-line database is built from coordinators' data, then it is the compilers of that database who should be on the warpath, not the ARRL. (Ironic, isn't it?) But, I thought that the whole idea of Conway's database was that net.hams would supply the empirical data, so it would be home-grown. Maybe I'm confused, too? Also, computerization will make it easier to present the data in useful ways, so that John Q. Ham can look up repeaters by frequency, by location, or by callsign to name a few. I still think that accuracy is crucial, since inaccurate data is worse than no data at all. So, why are we still jabbering about this? Don't say nothin, jes do it! -- rec.nude: your exit to good living along the Information Toll Road. finger bote@access.digex.net for PGP key and an operator will help you. Only 32 days until Opening Day! ------------------------------ End of Info-Hams Digest V94 #258 ****************************** ******************************