Date: Sun, 30 Jan 94 08:38:50 PST
From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <info-hams@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: Info-Hams-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Info-Hams Digest V94 #91
To: Info-Hams


Info-Hams Digest            Sun, 30 Jan 94       Volume 94 : Issue   91

Today's Topics:
                ARRL DX Bulletin #7 - January 27, 1994
                         CW filters and DSP-9
                  CW filters and DSP-9 - morse1.jpg
      Daily Summary of Solar Geophysical Activity for 27 January
                    FCC: Whats taking so long????
                  Frequencies for Animal Tracking ?
                        Got a callbook handy?
                              ham stuff
                         htx-202 or dj-162 ?
                        RAMSEY FX TRANSCEIVER
                       Sideband Technology Inc.
                          TF3CW QSL address
                 Your experiences on 40 meter CW QRP

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Info-Hams-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.

Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available 
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 28 Jan 1994 15:03:43 MST
From: library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.umbc.edu!eff!news.kei.com!yeshua.marcam.com!zip.eecs.umich.edu!destroyer!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!alberta!ve6mgs!usenet@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: ARRL DX Bulletin #7 - January 27, 1994
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

ZCZC AE05
QST de W1AW  
DX Bulletin 7  ARLD007
>From ARRL Headquarters  
Newington CT  January 27, 1994
To all radio amateurs   

SB DX ARL ARLD007
ARLD007 DX news

The items in this week's bulletin are courtesy of Bob, W5KNE; QRZ
DX; Karl, PS7KM; Dennis, WB0WAO; Tedd, KB8NW; the Ohio/Penn and
Yankee Clipper Contest Club PacketCluster networks.  Thanks.
 
PENGUIN ISLANDS LAST STAND?  Ian, ZS9A, reports that Baldur, DJ6SI,
is attempting to activate ZS0 around February 24.  And there are
rumblings that the Republic of South Africa may turn over both
Walvis Bay and Penguin Islands to Namibia at the end of February.

NETHERLANDS ANT
PJ2/OH1VR through February 2.  Seppo is likely to be active in the
CQ WW 160 Meter CW Contest.
 
BANGLADESH.  Eric, S21ZG, is on nearly every day between 3651 and
3653 kHz from 1145 to 1215z and 0000z.

EGYPT.  Listen for SU2MT on 3793 kHz at 0500z.

CAYMAN ISLANDS.  Vern, W8BLA, and Dick, K2UFT, are active on CW as
ZF1CQ.  They will be there until January 31 and plan to operate in
the 160 Meter Contest.  QSL via W8BLA.

SAINT LUCIA.  Scott N9JCL, hopes to sign J6/N9JCL from January 28 to
February 2.  Check 3795 Khz SSB or 3510 kHz CW at 0900z; 7003 kHz CW
at 1000z; and 14195 kHz SSB at 1200z.

OGASAWARA ISLANDS.  Here's a DX-first.  JA1LSY/JD1 will be operating
20 meter SST

FIJI.  Shinji, JI3ACL, will sign 3D2CL on 40 through 10 meter CW and
SSB February 10 to 16.  QSL via JI3ACL.

CQ WW 160 MET
W3HNK.  VR2MH will be OH2BH/VR2BH and OH1NYP.
 
FRENCH POLYNESIA.  Walter, DJ0FX, will work CW and SSB as FO0PT
through February 19.  This will be an all-band effort.

ANTIGUA.  John, AA2LW, is here on business, but operates 40 through
10 meter SSB as time allows.  His favorite band is 17 meters.

SAINT CHRISTOPHER.  Mike, W9NSZ, will sign V47NS on Nevis Island
from January 28 to February 2.

ANGUILLA.  KK3K, WB6LYI, KC6XC, KI4ZN, W9BVD, KF7IK, AF9A and AI9Q
are planning a serious effort for March 5 through 10.  They hope to
run all band all mode HF, and will be on OSCAR 13 Mode B and S.

TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS.  K2TD, N2VW and WB2YOF should be active
through early February signing /VP5.

MEXICO.  Rick, NE8Z, will operate from Puerto Vallarta as XE1/NE8Z
February 13 to 20 on all bands.  He will be active in the ARRL CW DX
Contest.  QSL via K8LJG.

ANTARCTICA.  Brian, VP8CFM, is Base Commander at the British
Antarctic Survey Base.  His duty tour is for 14 months and he will
be active as either VP8HAL or his own call.  QSL via GM4KLO.

SAINT PET
approximately two weeks, starting about February 2.  Plans are to
operate all HF bands plus OSCARs 10, 13 and 21.  Satellite operator
tips are 145.890 MHz CW on OSCAR 10 and 145.925 MHz on OSCAR 13.
QSL PY0SK via PS7KM.  QSL PY0SP via PT7AA.
NNNN

--
James J. Reisert  Internet:  reisert@wrksys.enet.dec.com
Digital Equipment Corp.  UUCP:    ...decwrl!wrksys.enet.dec.com!reisert
146 Main Street - MLO3-6/C9 Voice:    508-493-5747
Maynard, MA  01754  FAX:    508-493-0395

------------------------------

Date: 27 Jan 1994 18:22:30 GMT
From: nntp.ucsb.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!sgiblab!sgigate.sgi.com!olivea!news.bbn.com!news!levin@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: CW filters and DSP-9
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

In article <2i3fsu$7lh@news.acns.nwu.edu> rdewan@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Rajiv Dewan) writes:

   If we broaden the definition of ringing to allow for noisy signals, of
   the kind encountered on the low HF bands such as 80m, then there might
   be more than one source of ringing:
     . . . 
   2.  Progressive coloration of background white noise as the filter
   bandwidth is narrowed. . . .

You've nailed the head on the hit as far as I'm concerned, especially
on the low bands.  As I narrow the digital filter (the built-in audio
filter on the Yaesu 990) to eliminate QRM the noise acquires a pitch
which obscures the tone I'm trying to distinguish.  If only there were
some way (maybe there is!  I'm no expert with using the RF gain
control, for instance) to desensitize the receiver to the noise without
desensitizing it to the weak CW signal.

 /JBL
=
Nets: levin@bbn.com  |  "GO TO JAIL.  Go directly to jail. Do not pass
POTS: (617)873-3463  |  Go.  Do not collect $200."
KD1ON (@KB4N.NH.USA) |           -- Parker Brothers

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 29 Jan 1994 03:19:52 GMT
From: library.ucla.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!newncar!destroyer!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!alberta!ve6mgs!mark@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: CW filters and DSP-9 - morse1.jpg
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

me@next45.wsi.physik.tu-muenchen.de (Matthias Rosenberger) writes:

>According to the CW fiter discussion, I want to 
>supply some calcualtions shown in two pictures in following postings
>based on a Fourier analysis of a morse signal of 10 times 'e':
>00000101010101010101010100000

Back to the drawing board, Matthias, 10 `e's is:

0001000100010001000100010001000100010001000

Enjoy, Ciao -- Mark

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 27 Jan 1994 21:27:57 MST
From: agate!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!alberta!ve6mgs!usenet@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Daily Summary of Solar Geophysical Activity for 27 January
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

                /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

                 DAILY SUMMARY OF SOLAR GEOPHYSICAL ACT

                                27 JANUARY, 1994

                /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

                  (Based In-Part On SESC Observational Data)


SOLAR AND GEOPHYSICAL ACT
-----------------------------------------------------------

!!BEGIN!! (1.0) S.T.D. Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for DAY 027, 01/27/94
10.7 FLUX=120.5  90-AVG=105        SSN=063      BKI=2443 3433  BAI=018
BGND-XRAY=B3.6     FLU1=9.9E+05  FLU10=9.8E+03  PKI=2343 3433  PAI=016
  BOU-DEV=000,042,061,025,034,044,021,028   DEV-AVG=031 NT     SWF=01:027
 XRAY-MAX= M2.7   @ 0510UT    XRAY-MIN= B3.3   @ 1245UT   XRAY-AVG= C1.2
NEUTN-MAX= +002%  @ 1505UT   NEUTN-MIN= -003%  @ 1135UT  NEUTN-AVG= -0.2%
  PCA-MAX= +0.1DB @ 2215UT     PCA-MIN= -0.4DB @ 1915UT    PCA-AVG= -0.0DB
BOUTF-MAX=55349NT @ 1402UT   BOUTF-MIN=55319NT @ 1853UT  BOUTF-AVG=55335NT
GOES7-MAX=P:+000NT@ 0000UT   GOES7-MIN=N:+000NT@ 0000UT  G7-AVG=+062,+000,+000
GOES6-MAX=P:+136NT@ 1553UT   GOES6-MIN=N:-087NT@ 0706UT  G6-AVG=+083,+030,-029
 FLUXFCST=STD:120,115,110;SESC:120,115,110 BAI/PAI-FCST=015,010,015/018,010,015
    KFCST=3333 4433 2223 3322  27DAY-AP=018,022   27DAY-KP=1355 3322 3345 4322
 WARNINGS=*SWF
   ALERTS=**SWEEP:II=2@0401-0420UTC
!!END-DATA!!

NOTE: The Effective Sunspot Number for 26 JAN 94 was  56.0.
      The Full Kp Indices for 26 JAN 94 are: 1+ 3o 5- 3-   4- 4- 3o 2+ 


SYNOPSIS OF ACT
--------------------

             Solar activity was at moderate levels. A M2/1B flare
       erupted from Region 7654 (N07W78) at 0510UT.  An unassociated
       Type II radio emission was detected at 0401UT.

            Solar activity forecast:  solar activity is expected to be
       at low to moderate levels until Regions 7654 and 7658 (N11W53)
       depart the disk.

            The geomagnetic field has been at quiet to active levels
       for the past 24 hours.

            Geophysical activity forecast:  the geomagnetic field is
       expected to be at active levels through the remainder of the
       27 January. Quiet to unsettled levels are expected for the
       remainder of the forecast period.

            Event probabilities 28 jan-30 jan

                             Class M    45/45/45
                             Class X    01/01/01
                             Proton     01/01/01
                             PCAF       Green

            Geomagnetic activity probabilities 28 jan-30 jan

                        A.  Middle Latitudes
                        Active                20/10/20
                        Minor Storm           10/05/10
                        Major-Severe Storm    01/01/01

                        B.  High Latitudes
                        Active                20/10/20
                        Minor Storm           10/05/10
                        Major-Severe Storm    01/01/01

            HF propagation conditions were normal over the low and
       middle latitudes.  High and polar latitudes saw occasional
       minor signal degradation during the local night hours due.
       Near-normal propagation is expected over all regions during the
       next 72 hours, particularly for the low and middle latitude
       paths.  High and polar latitudes should see gradual
       improvements as well.  Brief SWF activity is still expected at
       times over daylit circuits during minor solar flare activity.


COPIES OF JOINT USAF/NOAA SESC SOLAR GEOPHYSICAL REPORTS
========================================================

REGIONS WIT
----------------------------------------------------------
NMBR LOCATION  LO  AREA  Z   LL   NN MAG TYPE
7652  N04W93  224  0040 HSX  02  002 ALPHA
7654  N09W78  209  0490 DKI  07  006 BET
7658  N12W53  184  0130 DAO  09  009 BET
7661  N08W02  133  0070 DAO  04  006 BET
7659  S12W14  145                    PLAGE
7660  S09E16  115                    PLAGE
REGIONS DUE TO RET
NMBR LAT
7648 N07   024
7650 N05   012
7653 S05   011


LISTING OF SOLAR ENERGETIC EVENTS FOR 27 JANUARY, 1994
------------------------------------------------------
BEGIN  MAX  END  RGN   LOC   XRAY  OP 245MHZ 10CM   SWEEP
 0341 0358 0409 7654  N08W68 C4.6  1N               II
 0456 0510 0531 7654  N11W65 M2.7  1B        51


POSSIBLE CORONAL MASS EJECTION EVENTS FOR 27 JANUARY, 1994
----------------------------------------------------------
 BEGIN        MAX      END     LOCATION   TYPE   SIZE  DUR  II IV
27/ 0401              0420       N08W68   RSP    C4.6   28  2
27/ 0840     0932     1003                LDE    C1.3   83


INFERRED CORONAL HOLES. LOCATIONS VALID AT 27/2400Z
---------------------------------------------------
               ISOLATED HOLES AND POLAR EXT
      EAST   SOUTH  WEST   NORTH  CAR  TYPE  POL  AREA   OBSN
58   N18W35 S20W53 S12W65 N30W43  188  ISO   NEG   021 10830A
59   N56W03 N30W18 N68W43 N68W43  164  EXT
60   S05E32 S10E25 S10E25 N18E29  111  ISO   NEG   002 10830A


SUMMARY OF FLARE EVENTS FOR THE PREVIOUS UTC DAY
------------------------------------------------

 Date   Begin  Max   End  Xray  Op Region  Locn    2695 MHz  8800 MHz  15.4 GHz
------  ----  ----  ----  ----  -- ------ ------  --------- --------- ---------
26 Jan: 0019  0028  0033  C1.0                                         
        0054  0058  0103  C1.1                                         
        0107  0118  0124  C2.5  SF  7654  N07W50                       
        0129  0136  0141  M1.5  1B  7654  N08W51        60       130        38
        0150  0200  0208  C6.5  SF  7654  N07W50                       
        0244  0247  0249  C1.0                                         
        0538  0541  0543  C1.4  SF  7654  N08W56                 190       320
        0611  0651  0657  C1.8  SF  7654  N07W56                       
        0726  0733  0741  C1.3                                    62        25
        0936  0939  0941  B7.3                                         
        1005  1011  1016  C1.0                                         
        1119  1142  1150  C4.6                                         
        1350  1359  1402  B5.9  SF  7658  N09W34                       
        1552  1619  1624  C2.5  SF  7654  N10W61                       
        1606  1607  1620        SF  7658  N11W35                       
        1630  1633  1636  C1.9                                         
        1639  1642  1645  C3.7                                         
        1716  1721  1726  C1.3  SF  7654  N08W60                       
        1849  1852  1854  C1.5  SF  7654  N09W62                       
        2020  2025  2030  C1.0                                         
        2054  2058  2100  B7.2  SF  7654  N08W62                       
        2117  2120  2122  B8.7  SF  7654  N09W63                       
        2132  2137  2140  B8.6                                         
        2146  2146  2156        SF  7654  N09W64                       
        2227  2237  2241  C1.6  SF  7654  N10W68                       


REGION FLARE STATISTICS FOR THE PREVIOUS UTC DAY
------------------------------------------------

                C   M   X     S   1   2   3   4   Total   (%)
               --  --  --    --  --  --  --  --    ---  ------
  Region 7654:  8   1   0    11   1   0   0   0    012  (48.0)
  Region 7658:  0   0   0     2   0   0   0   0    002  ( 8.0)
Uncorrellated: 9   0   0     0   0   0   0   0    011  (44.0)

 Total Events: 025 optical and x-ray.


EVENTS WIT
----------------------------------------------------------------

 Date   Begin  Max   End  Xray  Op Region  Locn    Sweeps/Optical Observations
------  ----  ----  ----  ----  -- ------ ------   ---------------------------
26 Jan: 0019  0028  0033  C1.0                     III
        0611  0651  0657  C1.8  SF  7654  N07W56   III
        1552  1619  1624  C2.5  SF  7654  N10W61   III
        1716  1721  1726  C1.3  SF  7654  N08W60   V
        2117  2120  2122  B8.7  SF  7654  N09W63   III
        2227  2237  2241  C1.6  SF  7654  N10W68   III

NOTES:
     All times are in Universal Time (UT).  Characters preceding begin, max,
     and end times are defined as:  B = Before,  U = Uncertain,  A = After.
     All times associated with x-ray flares (ex. flares which produce
     associated x-ray bursts) refer to the begin, max, and end times of the
     x-rays.  Flares which are not associated with x-ray signatures use the
     optical observations to determine the begin, max, and end times.

     Acronyms used to identify sweeps and optical phenomena include:

          II        = Type II Sweep Frequency Event
          III       = Type III Sweep
          IV        = Type IV Sweep
          V         = Type V Sweep
          Continuum = Continuum Radio Event
          Loop      = Loop Prominence System,
          Spray     = Limb Spray,
          Surge     = Bright Limb Surge,
          EPL       = Eruptive Prominence on the Limb.


**  End of Daily Report  **

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 27 Jan 1994 18:28:50 GMT
From: world!cravit@uunet.uu.net
Subject: FCC: Whats taking so long????
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

In article <2i8ptc$27g@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>,
William VanHorne <wvhorn@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> wrote:

>passed.  Secondly, my license (Gen.) took 10 weeks and 5 days to arrive
>back in December.

My Technician license took 10 weeks and 3 days to arrive (I got it 2
weeks ago).

>Patience.

Concurred. It will come _eventually_.  If it does not come within 90
days after the test date, call the ARRL VEC before you call the FCC.
They can verify when the FCC received the paperwork, and may advise
you to wait to call the FCC.

/Matthew N9VWG

-- 
Matthew Cravit, N9VWG               | All opinions expressed here are
Michigan State University           | my own. I don't speak for The World,
East Lansing, MI 48825              | and they don't speak for me (luckily
E-Mail: cravit@world.std.com        | for both of us).

------------------------------

Date: 28 Jan 94 18:45:40 GMT+12
From: ucsnews!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!waikato!comp.vuw.ac.nz!gcs.co.nz!amigans!home.amigans.gen.nz!halvey@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Frequencies for Animal Tracking ?
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

--
   Does anyone out there happen to have a list of the bands used for tracking
   animals fitted with radio collars. Preferably in New Zealand, but other
   locations would also be of interest.

   Thanks in advance.

--
 Dave Halverson, Wanganui N.Z.
 halvey@home.amigans.gen.nz

------------------------------

Date: 29 Jan 94 14:49:55 GMT
From: ogicse!qiclab!egreen!sitka.wednet.edu!connected.com!connected.com!jgates@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Got a callbook handy?
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

searanch@netcom.com (Robert C. Diefenbach) writes:

>I'm trying to locate an old pal, Barry Milburg, WD4DAA.  He moved
>from Atlanta to New Jersey in 1988, and may have changed his call.
>But if someone would take a peek at a current call book and let
>me have a mailing address (assuming he didn't change his call),
>I'd appreciate it.  Many thanks.
>73
>Rob Diefenbach
>WD4NEK


28 greenwood dr, millburn nj, 07041

-- 
John Gates, N7BTI, Edmonds, WA
206 774-3777
jgates@hebron.connected.com
CIS 72106,367

------------------------------

Date: 30 Jan 94 15:50:18 GMT
From: news-mail-gateway@ucsd.edu
Subject: ham stuff
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

interested in following your email service. I am a ham of 20 years, (still
under 40!!) with variable interests throughtout  the mode  and frequency
spectrum  Rick ve6gk.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 27 Jan 1994 16:53:18 GMT
From: nntp.ucsb.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!sdd.hp.com!apollo.hp.com!hpwin052!hpqmoea!dstock@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: htx-202 or dj-162 ?
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

Jerry Sy (ah301@yfn.ysu.edu) wrote:


: currently, I am leaning towards the dj-162 because of its wide 
: receive.

: jerry


    Wide receive is literal for all this class of radio, they tend to be
very prove to losing the ability to hear an Amateur band signal when
there are strong out-of band signals about. The only cure is having
tight filtering around the amateur band, and this precludes wide range
reception.

   You'll not be far wrong if you think of them as a box containing 3
things:

    1) a "scanner" with performance that places it at the cheap end of 
       the scanner market, and less frequency coverage than usual.

    2) A reasonable quality amateur band transmitter.

    3) An amateur band receiver with only the performance of a cheap
       scanner, that is very susceptible to strong unwanted signals.

    There are many people who have these and are delighted with them.
Possibly due to being in areas away from non-amateur transmitters, or
perhaps because they don't know what they've missed because they never
heard it....

    The Tandy hand-held may now be the only amateur hand-held that has
not seriously compromised its performance as an amateur band radio.

   I understand that some hand-helds now have computer game modes. Could
they have been included to give the user something to do while in areas
where blocking is frequent?


    Ok, I've got strong opinions in this area, but if scanning was your
prime interest, you probably wouldn't have got a licence.

    If you can't hear 'em, you can't work 'em.   whoever said it first
is probably long dead, but it is still true. Also don't you just always
lose contact just at a critical point in a talk-in etc.

    Cheers
            David

------------------------------

Date: 28 Jan 94 17:17:43 GMT
From: ogicse!psgrain!research-01.mskcc.org!psinntp!psinntp!arrl.org!ehare@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: RAMSEY FX TRANSCEIVER
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

Greg Bullough (greg@netcom.com) wrote:

: Steven has hit it on the head. As hams, we have for years said "can't
: afford a commercial rig? Home-brew or build a simple kit." Then
: QST and all the other magazines which bang this drum (which quite
: handily fills up magazine pages with circuits that few ever 
: build) reap big advertising dollars from kit companies. 

Greg,

For starters, I am not sure that few ever build projects from
magazines. Some of the authors that have offered a kit have reported
large sales -- to say nothing of those that either homebrew it
without a kit, or at least use part of the circuit as they build
something else. Go to any hamfest, note the rows upon rows of
vendors offering components. Hams are buying them, putting them
in bags and taking them home. They must be doing something with 
the parts.

Even if hams don't actually build very many projects, they sure seem
to enjoy reading (or thinking ) about building them! All of the ham and 
electronics magazines offer construction articles. I don't think I
would characterize printing articles that our readers like as "banging
a drum", but you may have meant something I just didn't understand.

Now, as for the big adverising dollars, I took a look at the February
QST issue. I counted two 1/8th-page ads, two 1/12th page ad and a 1/24th-
page ad, plus 4 ham ads, for companies offering kits. This is only
a small percentage of our total ad space; most of the ads are for
some form of ready-made product. Our editorial policy is not influenced
by our advertisers; it is determined by our perceptions of what
hams want to see. If the big advertisers were able to set our policy,
they would want us to run an article titled "Don't Build Your Own
Stuff -- Buy from QST Advertisers!" :-)

: As a hobby which has a tradition of mentoring ("elmering"), we are
: doing the Right Thing(TM) when we identify something like a Ramsey
: kit which is apt to blow a new ham's radio budget out the window
: while discouraging him or her, and leaving him without a working
: rig. 

Our QST Product Review did indeed point out the problems we found
with the Ramsey FX-146. We also pointed out those things we like.
This ensures that QST reviews are complete and unbiased. People
who read these things are able to decide which things are important
and buy accordingly.



-- 

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 27 Jan 1994 17:35:08 GMT
From: nntp.ucsb.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!ab376@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Sideband Technology Inc.
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

Recently liberated from our corp. lab, what appears to be a VHF
Transceiver.  Rig was built by Sideband Technology Inc. of Scottsville
N.Y. Model number is the ACSB Pioneer 1000.  Appears to be a 4 Channel
Xtal controlled with Xtals for 154.450 Mhz.  Looks like a straight forward
VHF rig from the Main board, but underneath is another board chock full of
chips in what appears to be the audio section.

Anybody any info on these rigs?  Would love a manual or even a schematic.

Regards
-- 
##############################################################################
                              Mike Ligeza Snr.- VE3UIL
                                 Ottawa, Ontario
                                    Canada

------------------------------

Date: 26 Jan 94 16:28:27 GMT
From: psinntp!psinntp!gdstech!gdstech!bat@rutgers.rutgers.edu
Subject: TF3CW QSL address
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

 I have a 1991 listing that says to use the TF buro.
-- 
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
*     Pat Masterson   D12-25  | KE2LJ@KC2FD                 *
*     Grumman Data Systems    | 516-346-6316.               *
*     Bethpage, NY 11746      | bat@gdstech.grumman.com     *

------------------------------

Date: 30 Jan 1994 00:20:57 GMT
From: destroyer!news1.oakland.edu!vela.acs.oakland.edu!prvalko@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Your experiences on 40 meter CW QRP
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

Andrew M. Cohn (andy@clark.net) wrote:
: If you work 40 meter CW, with 5 watts or less, and use less than ideal 
: antennas (no beams, dipoles or rhombics, etc), I would like to hear about
: your experiences. No...I'm not writing a book; I just want to know what
: I can expect before investing in a QRP station!  

Andy,

Why do you want to "invest in a QRP station!" ???  Getting into QRP is
something you generally do AFTER you've become bored with the typical
"fivenineQSLQRZ" contacts.  

If you are just studying for a ham ticket, I HIGHLY recommend NOT to get
involved with a QRP radio as a first choice.  Others disagree with me
but they are in the minority.

So wazzup???

73 =paul= wb8zjl

*** VANITY CALLS COMING SOON!!!  I GOT DIBS ON  K8T   !!!!!   ***

------------------------------

Date: 27 Jan 1994 10:29:59 +0200
From: mvb.saic.com!unogate!news.service.uci.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!EU.net!news.funet.fi!butler.cc.tut.fi!lehtori.cc.tut.fi!not-for-mail@network.ucsd.edu
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

References <2i44fb$e2h@news.acns.nwu.edu>, <2i66ll$m9t@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>, <2i699h$6sc@news.acns.nwu.edu>k
Subject : Re: CW filters and DSP-9: A recap of mimimum bandwidth


Rajiv Dewan (rdewan@casbah.acns.nwu.edu) wrote:

> In the thread on minimum bandwidth required for CW signal:

[Estimates between 16 and 72 Hz arrived from different approaches]

This approach is based on the Modulation and Demodulation chapter in 
the ARRL handbook. 

The baud rate BR is defined as WPM / 1.2 and thus 20 WPM is about 16.7 Baud.
The bandwidth BW is define as K * BR. Both CCIR and FCC recomend K = 3 
for non-fading circuits and K = 5 for (selectively) fading circuits.
Thus 20 WPM requires 50 Hz or 83 Hz if 5th harmonic is included.

In the same chapter, there is a graph with rise and fall time vs. maximum
speed and rise/fall time vs. required bandwidth. If 5 ms rise and fall
times are used (recomended by the ARRL) the maximum speed for non-fading
circuits is 60 WPM and 45 WPM for fading circuits.

At 5 ms rise/fall times the occupied bandwidth is about 150 Hz (-23 dB).
If we assume typical speeds (12-20 WPM), the transmitted spectrum is
dominated by frequency components from the rise/fall transition and not 
from the information contents of the signal. Except for a relatively few
high speed operators, the rise/fall time recomendation could be increased,
which would reduce the occupied bandwidth.

Using receiver filters which are narrower than 150 Hz will increase the
post-detection rise/and fall times, but the impulse response of the 
filter becomes more critical. At below 50 Hz and the third harmonic is
attenuated making aural reception very hard but machine reception of
20 WPM should be possible down to 17 Hz bandwidth.

                Paul OH3LWR
                

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone   : +358-31-213 3657                                 
X.400   : G=Paul S=Keinanen O=Elisa-Tampere A=ELISA C=FI 
Internet: Paul.Keinanen@Telebox.tele.fi
Telex   : 58-100 1825 (ATTN: Keinanen Paul)            
Mail    : Hameenpuisto 42 A 26
          FIN-33200 TAMPERE
          FINLAND

------------------------------

Date: 29 Jan 1994 22:48:14 GMT
From: usc!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!concert!inxs.concert.net!rock.concert.net!mikewood@network.ucsd.edu
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

References <CKAu6K.4Hy@freenet.carleton.ca>, <2i9e52INNmf7@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu>, <n1gakCKCyrq.M4K@netcom.com>rt
Subject : Re: Sideband Technology Inc.

In article <n1gakCKCyrq.M4K@netcom.com>,
Scott Statton <n1gak@netcom.com> wrote:
>In article <2i9e52INNmf7@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu> F. Kevin Feeney <fkf1@cornell.edu> writes:
>>In article <CKAu6K.4Hy@freenet.carleton.ca> Mike Ligeza,
>>ab376@FreeNet.Carleton.CA writes:
>>>Transceiver.  Rig was built by Sideband Technology Inc. of Scottsville
>>>N.Y. Model number is the ACSB Pioneer 1000.  Appears to be a 4 Channel
>>>Xtal controlled with Xtals for 154.450 Mhz.  Looks like a straight
>
This company was purchased by Aerotron , Inc a land mobile radio
manufacturer, around 1985. Aerotron is in Raleigh, NC and 
continued to manufacture the units until a year or so ago.
Aerotron is in Bankruptcy and recently held an auction of
the remaining ACSB and land mobile stuff. The remnants of
Aerotron has been moved to Orlando, Florida to share facilities
with another near death company (Repco) owned by the same
Greek investor. 

The radios have some very nice 9 Mhz xtal filters in them.
 
Mike Wood         Internet: mikewood@rock.concert.net
The Signal Group
P.O. Box 1979     ***Avoid company disclaimers by owning the company ***
Wake Forest, NC 27588
 
Phone: 919-556-8477       Fax: 919-556-0115

>
>

------------------------------

End of Info-Hams Digest V94 #91
******************************
******************************