Date: Mon, 27 Dec 93 15:41:35 PST
From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <info-hams@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: Info-Hams-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Info-Hams Digest V93 #1514
To: Info-Hams


Info-Hams Digest            Mon, 27 Dec 93       Volume 93 : Issue 1514

Today's Topics:
                           an idea (2 msgs)
                    CQ HB9 -- Any Swiss hams here?
                            CW Honor Roll
                         cw waivers (4 msgs)
     Daily Summary of Solar Geophysical Activity for 26 December
                   Paul Harvey Slams Radio Amateurs
                             R/C Aircraft
                                woops

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Info-Hams-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.

Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available 
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 27 Dec 1993 19:59:55 GMT
From: sdd.hp.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!astro.as.utexas.edu!oo7@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: an idea
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) says:

>>CW is, of course, allowed on *any* amateur
>>frequency, though it's hardly used on any frequency where better
>>modes, such as SSB or FM, are allowed.

If we could somehow cross-breed Gary with that Robert thing, 
we might end up with a real person.


Derek Wills (AA5BT, G3NMX)
Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, 
Austin TX 78712.  (512-471-1392)
oo7@astro.as.utexas.edu 

------------------------------

Date: 27 Dec 1993 19:57:31 GMT
From: sdd.hp.com!swrinde!news.dell.com!natinst.com!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!astro.as.utexas.edu!oo7@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: an idea
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) says:

>>CW is, of course, allowed on *any* amateur
>>frequency, though it's hardly used on any frequency where better
>>modes, such as SSB or FM, are allowed.

If we could somehow cross-breed Gary with that Robert thing, 
we might end up with a real person.


Derek Wills (AA5BT, G3NMX)
Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, 
Austin TX 78712.  (512-471-1392)
oo7@astro.as.utexas.edu 

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1993 22:24:32 GMT
From: world!slm@uunet.uu.net
Subject: CQ HB9 -- Any Swiss hams here?
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

Sorry for using so much bandwidth for this question, but I don't know
how to limit distribution to Switzerland; and maybe someone else knows
someone in Switzerland on e-mail or packet radio (doesn't have to be a
ham).

I need to ask someone in HB9 for a big communications favor. If you
might be able to help and want more details, please send e-mail to
slm@world.std.com. MANY THANKS. 73, Sharon KC1YR

 
-- 
electronic address: slm@world.std.com 

------------------------------

Date: 27 Dec 1993 19:46:48 GMT
From: swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!astro.as.utexas.edu!oo7@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: CW Honor Roll
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) claims:

>If the ARRL dropped the CW Honor Role [sic], it's likely that few 
>DXers would continue to operate CW, just as few operate AM because 
>there's no special status attached to that mode in the awards process.

This is so ludicrous that I'm not even going to comment on it...

Derek Wills (AA5BT, G3NMX)
Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, 
Austin TX 78712.  (512-471-1392)
oo7@astro.as.utexas.edu 

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1993 09:29:31 +0000
From: library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!darwin.sura.net!udel!news.sprintlink.net!demon!llondel.demon.co.uk!dave@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: cw waivers
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

In article <jfhCInu8z.207@netcom.com> jfh@netcom.com (Jack Hamilton) writes:
>
>Perhaps he meant "obsolete outside ham radio".  It's not likely that you
>will find a use for Morse code that's (a) not just a licensing requirement,
>like the code requirement for some commercial licenses, or (b) incapable
>of being replaced by a newer mode which is easier, faster, or both.
>
There is an organisation which puts job ads in Radio Communication magazine
with the following as part of the desired experience:
"We would prefer you to be capable of reading morse at 20wpm...."

And it is a multi-million pound organisation as well. If they don't think 
it is obsolete then it isn't!

Dave
-- 

*****************************************************************************
* G4WRW @ GB7WRW.#41.GBR.EU AX25     *    Start at the beginning. Go on     *
* dave@llondel.demon.co.uk  Internet *     until the end. Then stop.        *
* g4wrw@g4wrw.ampr.org      Amprnet  *      (the king to the white rabbit)  *
*****************************************************************************

------------------------------

Date: 27 Dec 93 21:05:49 GMT
From: att-out!cbnewsj!k2ph@rutgers.rutgers.edu
Subject: cw waivers
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu



------------------------------

Date: 27 Dec 93 20:46:00 GMT
From: att-out!cbnewsj!k2ph@rutgers.rutgers.edu
Subject: cw waivers
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu



------------------------------

Date: 27 Dec 1993 21:09:17 GMT
From: orca.es.com!olin!alan@uunet.uu.net
Subject: cw waivers
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

In article <1993Dec27.150035.10400@ke4zv.atl.ga.us> gary@ke4zv.atl.ga.us (Gary Coffman) writes:
>In article <2fkooa$hr@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> oo7@astro.as.utexas.edu (Derek Wills) writes:
>>lawrence.goodwin@support.com claims:
>>
>>>I recognize it as a nearly obsolete mode that is primarily still alive 
>>>for sentimental reasons. 
>>
>>  This is pure baloney.  CW has never been obsolete.  You may not like
>>  contesting, but for every phone contest there is a CW contest.  The

    This is not completely correct - there are some contests which are
    mixed mode (CW and SSB). Some of these have separate entry categories,
    and some do not. In Field Day (technically not a contest), anything
    goes - FM, Packet, RTTY, VHF, CW, SSB, etc. 

>>  best contesters are not interested in using obsolete modes, so why
>>  do these contests still exist and generate so much activity?  You may

    There are many reasons that people operate in contests. Sure, there
    is the lure of winning an award, but truthfully, there are many of
    us who do not win awards very often, so there must be some other
    reasons - like just participating and learning and developing our
    operating skills, or even making QSOs so that we can collect more 
    QSLs for DXCC or some other award like WAS.

>>  not like DXing, but all major expeditions operate mainly SSB phone and
>>  CW.  Why would people spend thousands of dollars to activate a rare
>>  country, aim to make as many QSOs as possible and then use an obsolete
>>  mode to do it?  Sure, there are a few phone-only expeditions, but there
>>  are also CW-only ones.  G3SXW spend 3 weeks on Tristan da Cunha and maded
>>  23,000+ QSOs on CW and about 3 on phone.  You think he did this just for
>>  sentimental reasons?
>
>CW is still alive among contesters because it's a *separate award category*.
>The purpose of contesting is to accumulate as many awards as possible, and

    Not all of us contesters are that interested in awards despite what you
    might believe. Some of us are interested in other aspects of operating
    our stations (or someone else's for that matter). Some of us who enjoy
    CW and enjoy contesting participate for many reasons, not just for the
    awards. There are some of us who are very competitive and will use
    every skill that we have to win, if not for the award, for the 
    "bragging rights" (witness Field Day, where there is no awards program 
    at all). I suspect that if contesting was not as popular as it appears 
    to be, the various sponsors would have lost interest in running them 
    many years ago.
    
>to get the CW Honor Role status, you have to operate CW. That says nothing

    I, for one, am not the least bit interested in getting on the CW Honor
    Roll (at least the DXCC Honor Roll). If there were a CW contesters
    Honor Roll or a "Hall of Fame", I would be interested in that, however.
    I have worked and confirmed nearly 300 DXCC countries, but you will
    not find my callsign on the DXCC list.

>about whether CW is obsolete or not. Some people restore antique cars to
>win show trophies. Some people collect postal cards for no apparent reason.
>They follow whatever rules are in force in order to pursue their mania for
>status, regardless of whether the rules make sense to an outside party.
>The ARRL has just created a RTTY Honor Role. I'm willing to bet that more
>Dxpeditions will now include RTTY operations for that reason. If the ARRL
>dropped the CW Honor Role, it's likely that few DXers would continue to

    There are some people who have the misconception that DXers are
    contesters and vice-versa. That is not necessarily so. There are some 
    DXers who cannot stand contests, and there are some contesters who are
    just not interested in DXing (to some extent, I am one of those). How
    many times have you heard a DXer who is at the top of the Honor Roll
    say, "Well, I have worked them all now. So now what do I do?" There is
    no contester, no matter how serious or competitive, who has won every 
    contest. There are so many variables that even if you win a contest in 
    one year, you can enter again the following year and not win because of 
    any number of reasons such as propagation anomalies, new competition - 
    you get the idea. So for us contesters, there are always new challenges
    ahead of us. You could say that, like most of us in real life, we 
    all have our own priorities and goals. Or, as one person once put it, 
    "Different strokes for different folks". 

>operate CW, just as few operate AM because there's no special status
>attached to that mode in the awards process.
>
>According to the Newsline article, RTTY, AMTOR, and *other non-CW
>digital protocols* all count toward the award. That opens the possibility
>for totally automated stations to achieve DXCC in a short time. No doubt
>many of the CW ops will look down on those as "not real hams". But I
>also bet they'll be scrambling to setup to win the award too. :-)

     Not me, at least not yet...

>
>Gary
>-- 
>Gary Coffman KE4ZV          |    You make it,     | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
>Destructive Testing Systems |    we break it.     | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary
>534 Shannon Way             |    Guaranteed!      | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary 
>Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |                     | 


-- 
Alan Brubaker, K6XO      |~~|_  "Pumps have handles, Hams have names;
<IYF disclaimer>         | *  |mine's Lee, what's yours?" - Lee Wical,
Internet: alan@dsd.es.com|____|KH6BZF, the Bloomin' Zipper Flipper.

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1993 23:25:39 MST
From: usc.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!cyber2.cyberstore.ca!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!alberta!nebulus!ve6mgs!usenet@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Daily Summary of Solar Geophysical Activity for 26 December
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

                /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

                 DAILY SUMMARY OF SOLAR GEOPHYSICAL ACTIVITY

                                26 DECEMBER, 1993

                /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

                  (Based In-Part On SESC Observational Data)


SOLAR AND GEOPHYSICAL ACTIVITY INDICES FOR 26 DECEMBER, 1993
------------------------------------------------------------

!!BEGIN!! (1.0) S.T.D. Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for DAY 360, 12/26/93
10.7 FLUX=125    90-AVG=099        SSN=092      BKI=1111 1213  BAI=005
BGND-XRAY=B4.2     FLU1=1.2E+06  FLU10=1.1E+04  PKI=2012 3223  PAI=007
  BOU-DEV=005,005,005,008,009,010,006,021   DEV-AVG=008 NT     SWF=02:007
 XRAY-MAX= M1.5   @ 0412UT    XRAY-MIN= B3.3   @ 1315UT   XRAY-AVG= C1.1
NEUTN-MAX= +003%  @ 2010UT   NEUTN-MIN= -002%  @ 2225UT  NEUTN-AVG= +0.1%
  PCA-MAX= +0.1DB @ 2355UT     PCA-MIN= -0.5DB @ 0915UT    PCA-AVG= -0.0DB
BOUTF-MAX=55354NT @ 0013UT   BOUTF-MIN=55332NT @ 2142UT  BOUTF-AVG=55347NT
GOES7-MAX=P:+000NT@ 0000UT   GOES7-MIN=N:+000NT@ 0000UT  G7-AVG=+071,+000,+000
GOES6-MAX=P:+132NT@ 1533UT   GOES6-MIN=N:-053NT@ 0751UT  G6-AVG=+093,+022,-028
 FLUXFCST=STD:130,130,135;SESC:130,130,135 BAI/PAI-FCST=010,015,025/010,015,025
    KFCST=0103 4011 2223 4222  27DAY-AP=008,004   27DAY-KP=4222 2222 2101 1211
 WARNINGS=*SWF;*MAJFLR
   ALERTS=**MINFLR:M1.5/1N@0412,N06W02(7640);**SWEEP:II=2@0728-0737UTC;
          **245STRM:0000-2359UTC
!!END-DATA!!

NOTE: The Effective Sunspot Number for 25 DEC 93 was  46.5.
      The Full Kp Indices for 25 DEC 93 are: 1o 3- 1+ 3-   2- 1o 2- 2o 


SYNOPSIS OF ACTIVITY
--------------------

             Solar activity was moderate. Region 7640 (N09W08) has
       been a most prolific region, producing an M1/1N flare at
       26/0412UT and no less than 15 C-class flares ranging from a
       C1/SF to a C6/1F flare. A Type II radio burst was detected from
       this region at 26/0728UT in association with a C4/1F flare.
       Region 7640 continued, but slowed, its growth and remains
       magnetically complex. Regions 7641 (N04W08) and 7643 (S18E41)
       showed no significant development.

            Solar activity forecast:  solar activity is expected to be
       low to moderate. Region 7640 has a fair chance for an
       occasional M-class flare and a small chance for an isolated
       X-class flare.

            The geomagnetic field has been at quiet levels for
       the past 24 hours.

            Geophysical activity forecast:  the geomagnetic field is
       expected to be quiet to unsettled for the first two days of the
       forecast period then active as a coronal hole rotates into a
       favorable position. High latitude stations could see minor to
       major storming by the end of the forecast period.

            Event probabilities 27 dec-29 dec

                             Class M    50/50/50
                             Class X    05/05/05
                             Proton     05/05/05
                             PCAF       Green

            Geomagnetic activity probabilities 27 dec-29 dec

                        A.  Middle Latitudes
                        Active                15/20/30
                        Minor Storm           05/10/25
                        Major-Severe Storm    01/05/05

                        B.  High Latitudes
                        Active                15/25/25
                        Minor Storm           05/15/35
                        Major-Severe Storm    01/05/10

            HF propagation conditions were normal over all regions.
       Propagation over the high and polar latitude paths have
       returned to normal due to the elevated levels of solar
       activity.  Near-normal conditions should dominate until about
       29 December when signals could again become degraded over the
       middle to polar latitude regions due to a recurrent coronal
       hole.


COPIES OF JOINT USAF/NOAA SESC SOLAR GEOPHYSICAL REPORTS
========================================================

REGIONS WITH SUNSPOTS. LOCATIONS VALID AT 26/2400Z DECEMBER
-----------------------------------------------------------
NMBR LOCATION  LO  AREA  Z   LL   NN MAG TYPE
7640  N09W08  201  0660 FKI  23  059 BETA-GAMMA
7641  N04W08  201  0080 HSX  02  002 ALPHA
7643  S18E41  152  0000 AXX  00  001 ALPHA
7635  N02W83  276                    PLAGE
7642  N11W47  240                    PLAGE
REGIONS DUE TO RETURN 27 DECEMBER TO 29 DECEMBER
NMBR LAT    LO
7633 S18   090
7630 S10   087
7629 S20   083
7634 S12   073


LISTING OF SOLAR ENERGETIC EVENTS FOR 26 DECEMBER, 1993
-------------------------------------------------------
A.  ENERGETIC EVENTS:
BEGIN  MAX  END  RGN   LOC   XRAY  OP 245MHZ 10CM   SWEEP
 0023 0029 0032              C1.6       1900
 0041 0041 0041                          110
 0140 0140 0140                          400
 0353 0412 0421 7640  N06W02 M1.5  1N
 0508 0519 0528 7640  N05W04 C1.7  SF    310
 0715 0727 0734 7640  N06W06 C4.6  1F   3000 63     II
 0937 0941 0944 7640  N05W09 C2.5  SF   1700
 1029 1039 1043              C4.0        150
 1053 1053 1053                          200
 1252 1253 1255                          420
 1541 1551 1601 7640  N07W11 C6.5  1F   1600 69
 1733 1736 1738 7640  N11W09 C1.0  SF    210



POSSIBLE CORONAL MASS EJECTION EVENTS FOR 26 DECEMBER, 1993
-----------------------------------------------------------
 BEGIN        MAX      END     LOCATION   TYPE   SIZE  DUR  II IV
26/ 0728              0737       N06W06   RSP    C4.6   19  2


INFERRED CORONAL HOLES. LOCATIONS VALID AT 26/2400Z
---------------------------------------------------
               ISOLATED HOLES AND POLAR EXTENSIONS
      EAST   SOUTH  WEST   NORTH  CAR  TYPE  POL  AREA   OBSN
                 NO DATA AVAILABLE FOR ANALYSIS


SUMMARY OF FLARE EVENTS FOR THE PREVIOUS UTC DAY
------------------------------------------------

 Date   Begin  Max   End  Xray  Op Region  Locn    2695 MHz  8800 MHz  15.4 GHz
------  ----  ----  ----  ----  -- ------ ------  --------- --------- ---------
25 Dec: 0103  0108  0111  C1.3                                         
        0115  0119  0125  C1.2                                         
        0132  0134  0137        SF  7640  N06E13                       
        0327  0330  0333  C1.5                                         
        0422  0429  0431  C6.2  SF  7640  N07E12                       
        0440  0449  0455  C4.3  SF  7640  N03E15                       
        0523  0530  0539  C4.4  SF  7640  N07E11                       
        0612  0616  0619  C1.7                                         
        0657  0716  0720  C5.8  SF  7640  N07E10                       
        0830  0839  0845  C4.5  SF  7640  N08E17                       
        0906  0910  0915  C2.1                                         
        1139  1245  1253        SN  7640  N08E10                       
        1229  1233  1236  C2.3                                         
        1241  1244  1248  C2.2                                         
        1411  1415  1417  C1.0                                         
        1441  1452  1455  C6.0  SF  7640  N07E07                       
        1521  1524  1530        SF  7640  N07E06                       
        1559  1602  1606        SF  7640  N07E06                       
        1615  1615  1623        SF  7640  N07E06                       
        1706  1711  1715  C4.6  SF  7640  N08E07                       
        1743  1745  1750        SF  7641  N04E08                       
        1826  1834  1903        SF  7640  N07E04                       
        1936  1939  1941  C1.8  SF  7640  N06E04                       
        1939  1940  1946        SF  7640  N07E04                       
        2021  2025  2030  C1.0                                         
        2117  2123  2128  C2.6                                         
        2258  2309  2322        SF  7640  N08E08                       


REGION FLARE STATISTICS FOR THE PREVIOUS UTC DAY
------------------------------------------------

                C   M   X     S   1   2   3   4   Total   (%)
               --  --  --    --  --  --  --  --    ---  ------
  Region 7640:  8   1   0    17   0   0   0   0    017  (60.7)
  Region 7641:  0   0   0     1   0   0   0   0    001  ( 3.6)
Uncorrellated: 10   0   0     0   0   0   0   0    010  (35.7)

 Total Events: 028 optical and x-ray.


EVENTS WITH SWEEPS AND/OR OPTICAL PHENOMENA FOR THE LAST UTC DAY
----------------------------------------------------------------

 Date   Begin  Max   End  Xray  Op Region  Locn    Sweeps/Optical Observations
------  ----  ----  ----  ----  -- ------ ------   ---------------------------
25 Dec: 0657  0716  0720  C5.8  SF  7640  N07E10   III
        1521  1524  1530        SF  7640  N07E06   III
        2021  2025  2030  C1.0                     III

NOTES:
     All times are in Universal Time (UT).  Characters preceding begin, max,
     and end times are defined as:  B = Before,  U = Uncertain,  A = After.
     All times associated with x-ray flares (ex. flares which produce
     associated x-ray bursts) refer to the begin, max, and end times of the
     x-rays.  Flares which are not associated with x-ray signatures use the
     optical observations to determine the begin, max, and end times.

     Acronyms used to identify sweeps and optical phenomena include:

          II        = Type II Sweep Frequency Event
          III       = Type III Sweep
          IV        = Type IV Sweep
          V         = Type V Sweep
          Continuum = Continuum Radio Event
          Loop      = Loop Prominence System,
          Spray     = Limb Spray,
          Surge     = Bright Limb Surge,
          EPL       = Eruptive Prominence on the Limb.


**  End of Daily Report  **

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1993 21:23:33 GMT
From: netcomsv!netcom.com!tweek@decwrl.dec.com
Subject: Paul Harvey Slams Radio Amateurs
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

Paul Harvey - Chicago... the Usenet alt.folklore.urban POSTER CHILD
in a broadcast on December 27 of 1993 (as heard on KGO Radio) was
up to his normal tactics of screwing up the facts on a story and in the
process slammed radio amateurs around the world.

The story he told...

- Hams listen to police radio transmissions on their equipment.

- Hams beat the cops to incidents to steal the victims blind.

- In England, cops set up a trap and broadcast a martian landing incident
  over their radios.  They then arrested all of the Hams who showed up.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

I will be forwarding this message to Paul Harvey's fax in Chicago
[312-899-4088] as well as formulating a letter with the REST OF THE STORY
FACTS about the difference between Hams and CBers, scanner listeners and
the like.  (Anyone else is welcome to do likewise as far as I am concerned.)

If anyone has saved the info from the UK martian sting thread in some of 
these newsgroups, can you forward them to me (tweek@netcom.com) so that I
can present them as well to Mr. AFU himself.

Mike Maxfield   tweek@netcom.com
Amateur Radio Station N6QYA as licensed by the Federal Communications
Commision of the United States of America.

------------------------------

Date: 27 Dec 93 23:04:56 GMT
From: news-mail-gateway@ucsd.edu
Subject: R/C Aircraft
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

>and may want to return it.  Well, I found out what TEMPER really
>can be.  I dont think Ill do that again!
>C ya.  Jeff  AC4ZO.

just give him a list of fines and some info about how he can get licensed next
time.  he might be mad, but you can be the hero saving him from some bizillion
dollar penality as well.

of course you can't tell some people things.

73, bill wb9ivr

------------------------------

Date: 27 Dec 1993 20:01:22 GMT
From: sdd.hp.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!astro.as.utexas.edu!oo7@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: woops
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

Sorry, that post called "an idea" was meant for the .policy 
group, no sense in polluting this group with stuff from over
there!

Derek Wills (AA5BT, G3NMX)
Department of Astronomy, University of Texas, 
Austin TX 78712.  (512-471-1392)
oo7@astro.as.utexas.edu 

------------------------------

Date: (null)
From: (null)
You can't possibly be serious!

CW is still alive among contesters BECAUSE IT'S FUN!

Only a handful of the 2000+ operators who send in entries for the CQ
Worldwide DX CW Contest every year get any awards.  And that says
nothing about the majority who didn't even send in their logs!  The
same is true for nearly every CW contest you can name.  The fact is
that most contesters have no hope of accumulating many awards.  There
are too many of us with too few awards to pursue for that to be our
purpose.  Clearly, for the overwhelming majority of contesters, the
accumulation of awards is NOT the purpose of contesting.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled flamefest.  8-{)

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Bob Schreibmaier K2PH  | UUCP:     ...!att!mtdcr!bob
AT&T Bell Laboratories | Internet: bob@mtdcr.att.com
Middletown, N.J. 07748 | ICBM:     40o21'N, 74o8'W

------------------------------

Date: (null)
From: (null)
This is too silly for words!  Very few of the 38% of active amateur
radio operators who use CW would drop the mode if the CW Honor Roll
were dropped.  That would be a really stupid reason to stop doing
something that you're having so much fun with!

-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Bob Schreibmaier K2PH  | UUCP:     ...!att!mtdcr!bob
AT&T Bell Laboratories | Internet: bob@mtdcr.att.com
Middletown, N.J. 07748 | ICBM:     40o21'N, 74o8'W

------------------------------

End of Info-Hams Digest V93 #1514
******************************
******************************