Date: Tue, 30 Nov 93 16:30:22 PST From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <info-hams@ucsd.edu> Errors-To: Info-Hams-Errors@UCSD.Edu Reply-To: Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu Precedence: Bulk Subject: Info-Hams Digest V93 #1407 To: Info-Hams Info-Hams Digest Tue, 30 Nov 93 Volume 93 : Issue 1407 Today's Topics: Aluminum towers Cross-band 2m/220mhz repeaters? Dial/meter marking program Ed Hare has no tie! Info-Hams Digest V93 #139 License Datapoints...got it : ) Mailer test...ignore, please. Microwave Power Amps Poor Man's Spectrum Analyzer --- comments? Repeater calling procedure (Was: Elmers are dead, god help us hams!) Space Shuttle coverage? using a radio off frequency in emergencies W5YI's coverage of "temporary callsigns" (2 msgs) WANTED: Inet <-> Packet gateways Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu> Send subscription requests to: <Info-Hams-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu> Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu. Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams". We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 30 Nov 93 17:49:23 GMT From: ogicse!emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary@network.ucsd.edu Subject: Aluminum towers To: info-hams@ucsd.edu In article <9311291443.AA10891@wa2cjt.wellfleet> ginsburg@wellfleet.COM (Scott Ginsburg) writes: > >I'm interested in hearing about any good/bad experiences people have had with >freestanding aluminum towers. I'm considering something like a Universal Mfg. >50' tower. I'd probably mount a small tri-bander on it (14 to 18' boom). Aluminum has a much lower fatigue strength than steel. Towers develop fairly unique vibrational modes depending on particular location and loading. So it's difficult to engineer them to fit any particular fatigue pattern. That means for aluminum that the tower must be heavily over engineered in order to withstand unpredictable fatigue stresses. Most aluminum towers are *not* so over engineered, and those that are are more expensive and larger than a similar steel tower. Aluminum also loses strength as it ages. So aluminum towers generally don't last as long as steel towers. Therefore, I don't recomend aluminum towers. Ordinary galvanized steel towers are usually the first choice, but in highly corrosive environments stainless steel towers are the best choice. Aluminum should only be considered if weight is the only criteria, and that's almost never the case, even for roof mounting. Gary -- Gary Coffman KE4ZV | Where my job's going, | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary Destructive Testing Systems | I don't know. It might | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary 534 Shannon Way | wind up in Mexico. | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary Lawrenceville, GA 30244 | -NAFTA Blues | ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1993 22:57:58 GMT From: qualcomm.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!hamblin.math.byu.edu!wicat!keithm@network.ucsd.edu Subject: Cross-band 2m/220mhz repeaters? To: info-hams@ucsd.edu > How many cities and where? I'm curious..... Utah County ARES in the Orem/Provo Utah area runs one. -- Keith McQueen, Wicat Systems Inc. , (801)223-3284 | My opinions are | Packet: n7hmf @ nv7v.UT.USA.NA | all mine... | Internet: keithm@wicat.com | ...so there! | ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1993 21:41:55 GMT From: netcomsv!netcom.com!wd6cmu@decwrl.dec.com Subject: Dial/meter marking program To: info-hams@ucsd.edu Does anybody know of a program that will generate Postscript files for printing labels for dials, rotary switches, meters, etc.? I thought I remembered seeing such a thing and I thought I'd check before trying to write one myself. Thanks. -- Eric Williams | DGC Vincent: MC (B+S)t G+Y 1.2 Y L++ C+ T+ I+++ H+ S++ V+ F++ wd6cmu@netcom.com | Murphy: DS W+(B+R)t+R Y 1.3 Y L C+ T- I+++ H+ A+ F+ B-- WD6CMU@WD6CMU.#NOCAL.CA.USA.NA ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1993 01:07:40 GMT From: world!dts@uunet.uu.net Subject: Ed Hare has no tie! To: info-hams@ucsd.edu In article <2650@arrl.org> ehare@arrl.org (Ed Hare - KA1CV) writes: >In rec.radio.amateur.misc, hellman@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (eric.s.hellman) writes: > >>Yesterday I visited the ARRL in Newington and met Ed Hare in his >>office. He could not produce even one tie! (There was a rumpled >>sport jacket hanging behind the door). > >>Thanks, Ed, for the nice visit. > >>Shel WA2UBK dara@physics.att.com > >My pleasure, Shel. I am always pleased when one of my friends on >r.r.a. stops by to say "hello" when they are here in CT. > >Now, about the tie --- I can explain. You see, the legend of my tie >is greatly exaggerated! I ONLY wear a tie when I go to do a club talk, >or when we are having important visitors. That is why it was so Oh, NOW I'm insulted :-). We (KC1SP, N1JIT, WA1RHP and I) were not IMPORTANT visitors??? :-) We'll just have to see what happens on our next trip to Newington! >horrifying when my tie was ripped from my neck when I did my >talk in western Massachusetts (by WA1RHP -- a longtime usenet denizen)! >Of course, it was okay, because this evil deed was perpetrated by >a friend, but ... if this is how I am treated by my friends, how horrible >it will be if I am ever mistreated by an enemy! :-) > >However, there is a bit more to the story! About a year ago or so I >was suddenly siezed by a tie madness. I went out and purchased about >two or three hundred ties, mostly at vintage clothing stores. They >represent the best of several decades of tie wearing! I will select one >for you and send it as a souvenir of your visit to HQ. You might even >dare to wear it in front of your boss! > >Glad you stopped by! It was nice to meet you. > >73 and Happy Holidays from ARRL HQ, Ed -- KA1CV > >----- >Ed Hare, KA1CV ehare@arrl.org >American Radio Relay League >225 Main St. >Newington, CT 06111 If you tie a strip of colored cloth to >(203) 666-1541 - voice part of your body, the tribe acts >ARRL Laboratory Supervisor differently! >RFI, xmtr and rcvr testing >----- -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Senie Internet: dts@world.std.com Daniel Senie Consulting n1jeb@world.std.com 508-365-5352 Compuserve: 74176,1347 ------------------------------ Date: 30 Nov 93 13:01:00 GMT From: news-mail-gateway@ucsd.edu Subject: Info-Hams Digest V93 #139 To: info-hams@ucsd.edu -> Speaking of WSSH, has anyone in the Boston area had any intermittent -> reception problems during any of the above mentioned shows (like -> their transmitter loses power for a period of time), or is it just -> me? Yes, it has been happening alot. Most noticeably on the 28th -- when the loss lasted about 20 minutes! Sigh! ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1993 20:00:54 GMT From: munnari.oz.au!uniwa!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!cs.yale.edu!csusys.ctstateu.edu!white@network.ucsd.edu Subject: License Datapoints...got it : ) To: info-hams@ucsd.edu The long-awaited envelope arrived today....7 weeks and 1 day after the test (Oct 10).... It's an honor to join the ranks of amateur radio operators. 73s +---- --- -- - - -- --- ----+ Harry White white@sleepy.ctstateu.edu white@csusys.ctstateu.edu N1QVE Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT 06050 - -- -+- -- - "The real meaning of the word _educate_ is _to lead the way out_." -Anais Nin +---- --- -- - - -- --- ----+ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1993 20:35:39 GMT From: munnari.oz.au!uniwa!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!cs.yale.edu!csusys.ctstateu.edu!white@network.ucsd.edu Subject: Mailer test...ignore, please. To: info-hams@ucsd.edu mailer test ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1993 00:08:34 GMT From: munnari.oz.au!uniwa!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!fconvx.ncifcrf.gov!fcs260c!mack@network.ucsd. Subject: Microwave Power Amps To: info-hams@ucsd.edu In article <CH9ItM.539@ncifcrf.gov> mack@fcs260c.ncifcrf.gov (Joe Mack) writes: Sorry about the first posting which was missing some things... Jeff Kruth has TWTs and solid state amps from 3-10GHz. They are used and he tests them to see which are OK. His guarantee is that they will work on arrival. He trades and sells surplus stuff in this area. I don't know much about hi except that no-one has complained about stuff they get from him. > Jeff Kruth > K-MEC > 2600 Cabover Dr, Suite H > Hanover MD, 21076 > (410)-768-6666 > > Joe NA3T > mack@ncifcrf.gov > > > Joe NA3T mack@ncifcrf.gov ------------------------------ Date: 30 Nov 93 14:20:36 GMT From: ogicse!uwm.edu!caen!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!mimbres.cs.unm.edu!nmt.edu!bateman@network.ucsd.edu Subject: Poor Man's Spectrum Analyzer --- comments? To: info-hams@ucsd.edu I am considering buying the kit(s) for the Poor Man's Spectrum Analyzer from Science Workshop. Has anybody had any experiences with this unit (in either building or operating)? Any comments appreciated! Please e-mail: bateman @ nmt.edu Thanks, Monte -- =============================================================================== Dr. Monte Bateman -- Physics PostDoc | InterNet: bateman @ nmt.edu Langmuir Laboratory for | Amateur Radio: WB5RZX Atmospheric Research, | New Mexico Institute of Mining | and Technology, Socorro, NM | ------------------------------ Date: 30 Nov 1993 00:11:55 GMT From: qualcomm.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!col.hp.com!bobw@network.ucsd.edu Subject: Repeater calling procedure (Was: Elmers are dead, god help us hams!) To: info-hams@ucsd.edu Brian Battles WS1O (bbattles@arrl.org) wrote: : I believe the pamphlet you're referring to is Welcome to Amateur Radio, : which I wrote (sent by the ARRL free to all new Amateur Radio licensees). : Here's the lowdown: : The information was taken from personal experience and extensive : contact with friends, ARRL officials and many various "random" : repeater owners and users around the US over a few years. The use of : "WS1O monitoring" or "WS1O listening" is essentially the de facto : standard way of announcing that you're on the machine and would enjoy : a QSO. Calling CQ is in no way "expressly verboten," it's just generally : considered substandard operating procedure on VHF repeaters (as is the : use of Q signals and CW abbreviations, eg, XYL, HI, etc). : You can call CQ, but I'd bet that most hams--especially those with : some experience--would take you for, at best, an uninformed newcomer : or, at worst, a lid. Then, depending on the other hams' attitudes, : they'd either politely instruct you or rudely rag you out. 8-) Negativo, Senor. Clearly, the use of a LLLLOOOONNNNGGGGG CQ is inappropriate on VHF repeaters but in some parts of the woods a single "CQ" is accepted as just fine. Often "monitoring" gets interpreted as "I am here if you really wanted to call me but I'm not actively looking for a contact." Different strokes... Bob Witte / HP PMO (Colo Springs) / bobw@col.hp.com / KB0CY / (719) 590-3230 ------------------------------ Date: 30 Nov 93 21:00:41 GMT From: ogicse!emory!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!paperboy.amoco.com!apctrc!zrmo05@network.ucsd.edu Subject: Space Shuttle coverage? To: info-hams@ucsd.edu Does anyone know the frequencies which carry the Space Shuttle launch? I seem to recall that an amateur radio group at JSC broadcast the missions but don't remember more than that. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1993 00:22:45 GMT From: qualcomm.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!news.ecn.bgu.edu!willis1.cis.uab.edu!right.dom.uab.edu!user@network.ucsd.edu Subject: using a radio off frequency in emergencies To: info-hams@ucsd.edu I was looking at the Amateur radio news postings and came across an article about an amateur that was in a remote area who had an injured friend. The story went that after trying several repeaters without success and trying to use a cellular phone without success, he called for help on a police frequency. He was forced to forfeit his radio when the sherriffs department complained. The story goes on from there, and the FCC, the ham, and the Sherriffs office will be meeting in court. I was wondering what is the correct thing to do if one has a radio that can transmit outside of amateur bands and a real, life threatening emergency arises. I thought there was a rule about amateurs being authorized to use any radio at their disposal if normal communications were not available when there was a life threatening emergency. Has anyone any advice on what one should do if a similar event happened to me? No legal advice expected, just interested on what the folks on the net may have to say. Reply to rec.radio.radio.amateur Steve Holland ------------------------------ Date: 30 Nov 93 17:05:35 GMT From: mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx10!jmaynard@uunet.uu.net Subject: W5YI's coverage of "temporary callsigns" To: info-hams@ucsd.edu [This belongs in .policy; crossposted, and followups redirected.] In article <CHBBzq.9HJ@cup.hp.com>, Jim Hollenback <jholly@cup.hp.com> wrote: >I personally can not see one reason for not adopting the proposal. Currently >we allow instant access to new privileges on upgrading, why not access to >the privileges when first obtaining a license? Verification. How do I know that WZ5RFK is legit? I can find out, at least, who belongs to KC5CZR; that's not the case with the temporary calls. I understand the problem the FCC, and new hams, face...but, like every knotty problem, it has a simple and easy-to-understand wrong answer. The FCC has come up with exactly that. They're already going to upgrade their systems; let's get that in place, as well as improving their work flow, and perhaps even let the VECs do more of the work. If we can't get the turnaround time under two weeks, something's horribly wrong. _That_ is the right answer. -- Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu | adequately be explained by stupidity. "The road to Usenet is littered with dead horses." -- Jack Hamilton ------------------------------ Date: 30 Nov 1993 07:41:20 -0500 From: noc.near.net!genrad.com!genrad.com!not-for-mail@uunet.uu.net Subject: W5YI's coverage of "temporary callsigns" To: info-hams@ucsd.edu I just got my most recent W5YI Report, and of course I had to read it before anything else. One of the articles disturbed me and I was curious what others think. He (Fred Maia, W5YI, for those of you who don't know) described a new petition that has been before the FCC for awhile (after a new ham passes his tests, he can immediately start talking on the radio by using the callsign "WZ" plus call area number plus his initials. This would be good for 12 weeks or until he gets his real callsign). He said that he looked at some of the letters that had been coming in to the FCC on this subject, and then he printed portions of some of these letters. The thing that bothered me was that EVERY ONE OF THE LETTERS described why this proposal would NOT be good for ham radio. Not a single one described any reason why this proposal would be good for ham radio. Now, it may be true that this proposal IS NOT GOOD for ham radio (I do not offer an opinion). But, the fact that the proposal is before the FCC must indicate that at least ONE PERSON saw it as beneficial, and possibly more than one. Do the people who support this proposal NOT send letters to the FCC? Or is Fred's article simply biased because he does not like the proposal, so he's only reporting a one-sided argument? I'm curious as to what others think of this article. Am I being too sensitive? Diana -- ->Diana L. Carlson dls@genrad.com Ham: KC1SP (Sweet Pea) <- ->I'D RATHER BE FLYING! P-ASEL, INST CAP: CPT, Freedom 690M, MAWG<- ->GenRad, 300 Baker Ave MS/1, Concord, MA 01742 (508)369-4400 x2459 <- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1993 23:01:59 GMT From: pacbell.com!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!lynx!chaos.dac!wy1z@network.ucsd.edu Subject: WANTED: Inet <-> Packet gateways To: info-hams@ucsd.edu I want to compile as complete a listing/library as possible of all the different Internet <-> packet gateways and instruction on how to use them. When I have received the information, I will place all the messages into the Boston Amateur Radio Club's FTP area on the World Public Access Internet system (see my .sig below). Thanks much in advance! 73, Scott -- =============================================================================== | Scott Ehrlich Internet: wy1z@neu.edu | | Amateur Radio: wy1z AX.25: wy1z@n0ary.#nocal.ca.usa.na | |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Maintainer of the Boston Amateur Radio Club hamradio FTP area on | | the World - world.std.com /pub/hamradio | =============================================================================== ------------------------------ Date: 29 Nov 1993 16:22:33 -0800 From: qualcomm.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!news.cyberstore.ca!vanbc.wimsey.com!vanbc.wimsey.com!not-for-mail@network.ucsd.edu To: info-hams@ucsd.edu References <931128034939811@pubcon.fort-worth.tx.us>, <D>, <1993Nov29.210113.8647@merlin.dev.cdx.mot.com>ne Subject : Re: DSP units With spelling like that, you get lousy sentence structure. ("That" is ".... like this your asking ...) [We all assume you mean "You're" or "You are" /Mark ------------------------------ Date: 30 Nov 93 17:14:55 GMT From: ogicse!emory!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!mac13@network.ucsd.edu To: info-hams@ucsd.edu References <754583670.19snx@mu.apana.org.au>, <Nov29.194927.39093@yuma.acns.colostate.edu>, <4926@eram.esi.com.au> Subject : Re: Calculating SWR In article <4926@eram.esi.com.au>, dave@eram.esi.com.au (Dave Horsfall) wrote: > > In article <Nov29.194927.39093@yuma.acns.colostate.edu>, > galen@picea.CFNR.ColoState.EDU (Galen Watts) writes: > > | >I am not trying to be mean, but did you sit a radio theory test for your > | >amateur license ? > | > | Yes, he did. SWR formulae are not on amateur tests in America. > > Notwithstanding the fact that I distinctly remember seeing that formula > on my own exam (in Australia) and no doubt getting it wrong, don't they > teach you to look up a reference book over there? > > This is getting to be like sci.electronics; can anyone tell me what > the pinout of a 555 is? > The whole point is that this is NOT an electronics newsgroup, but rather a newsgroup for amateur radio operators, not all of whom have--or even need to have--a detailed understanding of how the equipment they operate actually works. When such a person does express an interest in a technical matter, one might hope that those whose specialities center around technical aspects of the hobby would respond with encouragement, or if that is impossible, politeness. Fortunately, I can state that my own questions in this newsgroup have been answered with unfailing courtesy. In this same vein, I will admit my surprise, after sitting for all the U.S. amateur radio examination elements, that there was such an emphasis on electronics, and so very little concerning public service, disaster readiness, first aid procedures, emergeny traffic handling, and so on. If we are really intended to be a provider of alternative communications services in times of national emergencies or local disasters, surely such knowledge is at least as important as the ability to homebrew a radio. But for some odd reason these topics are left almost entirely to specific organizations, while EVERYONE is required to have a general knowledge of electronics. Surely both are important. And maybe we could do more to test normal operating procedures as well. Charles R. Hohenstein N9SQE ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1993 12:07:31 GMT From: swrinde!menudo.uh.edu!uuneo!sugar!jreese@network.ucsd.edu To: info-hams@ucsd.edu References <2651@arrl.org>, <9311292209592.gilbaronw0mn.DLITE@delphi.com>, <williams.754643364@maui> Subject : Re: Repeater calling procedure (Was: Elm In article <williams.754643364@maui> williams@maui.qualcomm.com (Paul Williamson) writes: > >Interesting you should say that. I had to read the rest of the paragraph >to figure out what *you* think it means. > >I was once active on a repeater in southeast Texas where "monitoring" >meant "I'm a control operator and I'm in charge here", and ordinary >users were strongly discouraged from saying it. We were supposed to say >"listening" instead. ...Sounds like ECHO .09 :) What I've always told people is that they should use a radio just like they would a telephone. You wouldn't say "The Personal is Jim" on the phone, don't do it on the radio...it just sounds silly there. -- Jim Reese, WD5IYT | "I can do more in two minutes than Rush can in jreese@sugar.neosoft.com | three hours" --Jim Hightower ------------------------------ End of Info-Hams Digest V93 #1407 ****************************** ******************************