Date: Mon,  8 Nov 93 04:30:07 PST
From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <info-hams@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: Info-Hams-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Info-Hams Digest V93 #1321
To: Info-Hams


Info-Hams Digest            Mon,  8 Nov 93       Volume 93 : Issue 1321

Today's Topics:
                            BAUD VS BAUDS
                       characteristic impedance
           Neat Feature on New Motorola Commercial Handheld
           Radio Shack WeatherRadio Modification/Schematic
                      Scanner for sale in Canada
                              Slowpokes
                          Wanted, Icom Radio
                         We've lost him, Jim!

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Info-Hams-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.

Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available 
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sat,  6 Nov 93 20:22:00 -0500
From: pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!wetware!sgiblab!swrinde!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunic!psinntp!psinntp!channel1!ken.smith@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: BAUD VS BAUDS
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

K2PH@CBNEWSJ.CB.ATT.COM  typed this about Re: BAUD VS BAUDS

K>> AGRI098@UNLVM.UNL.EDU (Roy): IS THE TERM BAUD LIKE MOST PEOPLE USE
K>> OR IS IT BAUDS LIKE THE ARRL FOLKS USE?
K>> Roy

K>Depends.  Singular is baud.  Plural is bauds.  If it's more than one,
K>bauds is correct.

K>73,
K>Bob K2PH

Doesn't BAUD fall into the category of words like DATA? It remains the 
same.



Ken

---
  CmpQwk #UNREG  UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY

------------------------------

Date: 8 Nov 93 11:52:33 GMT
From: news-mail-gateway@ucsd.edu
Subject: characteristic impedance
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

No-one has yet pointed out that you can 'measure' it directly! No need for
anything electrical, electronic or radio.

The characteristic impedance of a line is given by the formula

 Zo = 138Log (d2/d1) 

where d2/d1 is the ratio of the respective diameters of the inner and outer
elements of the line.
If the line has a solid center conductor, its easy! Get out your vernier
callipers or micrometer, and a scientific calculator (or log-tables for 
oldtimers).  Multi-stranded center conductors may need some extra
trigonometry; measure the thickness of one strand, count the number of
strands, work out the mean diameter..... or isnt this sort of thing taught
in math classes these days?
_______________________________________________________________________________
 Peter J.M. Lucas    NERC Computer Services      Swindon     England
       pjml@swmis.nsw.ac.uk     pjml@uk.ac.nsw.swmis     g6wbj@gb7sdn.gbr.eu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    The site of Lenin's tomb would be a great location for a Lexus dealership
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1993 18:55:20 GMT
From: fluke!pwl@beaver.cs.washington.edu
Subject: Neat Feature on New Motorola Commercial Handheld
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

Old timers may remember a hand-held multimeter that HP made many moons
ago.  It was in a case shaped like a huge cigar, with an LED display.
There was a switch on the unit that flipped the display so that you
could read it no matter which way you were holding it.  Must have been
almost twenty years ago.

Paul,
KE7XT
--
 Paul Lutt
Domain: pwl@tc.fluke.COM
 Voice: +1 206 356 5059
  UUCP: uunet!fluke!pwl
 Snail: Fluke Corporation / P.O. Box 9090 / Everett, WA 98206-9090

------------------------------

Date: 8 Nov 93 00:41:23 GMT
From: att-out!cbnewsh!mrb1@rutgers.rutgers.edu
Subject: Radio Shack WeatherRadio Modification/Schematic
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

Hi ---

The library where my wife works went out and bought a Radio Shack WeatherRadio Alert,
Model 12-140 to let them know when there will be bad weather, etc.  Unfortunately,
the person purchasing it did not get the instruction book.  Well, they did manage to
set it up and get it to work OK but they find the alert noise to be too unnerving
(especially in a quiet place like a library).  What they really need is for the darn
thing to stay muted until there is an alert, and then the speaker unmutes and everyone
can hear the message .... not the way it presently works where it squeals away until
someone presses the WEATHER button to hear the announcement.

My first thought was to open it up and clip a lead on the little piezoelectric
sounder or whatever is in there that makes the alert noise.  But upon opening it
up carefully, it appears as though the alert noise is summed with the receiver audio
before amplification & going out the speaker.  And without a schematic, I'm a bit
reluctant to do much more.  Plus how would you know there was an alert so you could
hit the WEATHER button and hear it ?!

So here's the question(s) ---

 There's a little switch on the back bottom plate marked "ALERT LOCK" ---
 will this make the receiver do what I want?  What does it do?

  -and/or-

 Does anyone have a schematic who can tell me what lead to lift to kill
 the alert tone & make the speaker unmute instead ?

  -and/or-

 Can someone with a schematic advise where the alert tone audio is generated
 and summed in, so I can attenuate to a bearable level ?

I would appreciate any and all replies (and anyone suggesting a modification is
absolved of all responsibility).  E-mail preferred as I am posting to several
relevant groups.

Thank you in advance,
Maurice R. Baker, WA3ZXO
ATT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
reply to    mrbaker at attmail.com  (or this message)

------------------------------

Date: 6 Nov 93 17:34:52 GMT
From: utcsri!utnut!torn!news2.uunet.ca!math.ohio-state.edu!cyber2.cyberstore.ca!vanbc.wimsey.com!deep.rsoft.bc.ca!mindlink.bc.ca!a9414@rutgers.rutgers.edu
Subject: Scanner for sale in Canada
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

If I am not to post this type of message here, forgive me
REALISTIC RADIO SHACK SCANNER
300 CHANNEL PRO-2004 VHF-UHF
DIRECT ENTRY PROGRAMMABLE AM FM RECEIVER
MODIFIABLE TO RECEIVE CELLULAR FREQUENCIES
CAN BE UP GRADED TO PRO-2006 WITH SIMPLE MODIFICATIONS
ASKING PRICE $275.00 FIRM
INQUIRES PLEASE LEAVE NET-MAIL
I have receiently modified the scanner to receive cellular and it works fine.

------------------------------

Date: 6 Nov 93 00:00:38 GMT
From: uswnvg!cjackso@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Slowpokes
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

Derek Wills (oo7@emx.cc.utexas.edu) wrote:
: alanb@sr.hp.com (Alan Bloom) says:

:   comes back with their call and QRZ? again.   Ack.  Of course, if you 
:   listen a bit before calling, you know the rhythm of the DX op, and if 
:   you have a long call and send it slowly, the best thing to do is turn 
:   off the radio and study to upgrade...

Yeah, right - I can't think of a better way to persuade those of us who ARE
trying to upgrade how nice and friendly our fellow hams can be.  No wonder
most of the growth is in the "no-code".  

--
Clay Jackson - N7QNM
US WEST NewVector Group Inc
Bellevue, WA
uunet!uswnvg!cjackso

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1993 13:10:30 GMT
From: dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunic!psinntp!psinntp!laidbak!tellab5!jwa@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Wanted, Icom Radio
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

I'm looking for an Icom IC-745.  It doesn't have
to be in mint condition.  I can't afford one that
is!

Reply by e-mail only.




--- 
   Jack Albert                Fellow Radio Hacker 
         Tele (708) 378-6201 
   Tellabs Operations, Inc.     FAX  (708) 378-4590 
   1000 Remington Blvd.         jwa@tellabs.com
   Bolingbrook, IL  60440            
    "he,hehe,hehe,hehehe,hehe
     hey,heyhey,heyheyhey,hey"
       
         Bevis & Butthead 

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 8 Nov 93 06:46:54 GMT
From: btree!bly@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: We've lost him, Jim!
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu

In article <2b8tda$rvo@hp-col.col.hp.com> dfk@col.hp.com (David F. Kurth) writes:
>: I've heard it said that it's possible to hear MIR, the Space Shuttle,
>: OSCAR, etc. with an HT and position-plotting software, tables, etc.

It is very possible to make duplex contact with a Low Earch Orbit (LEO)
satellite with an HT and wip antenna.  Prob. need 400 Mhz and up.
Tests for the coming satellite-based pocket phones showed communications
to be high quality with less than 1 watt and a 5 inch antenna.

-- 

Roger Bly Jr.
bly@brooktree.com

------------------------------

End of Info-Hams Digest V93 #1321
******************************
******************************