1500. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1501. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1502. Chinese OCR? 1503. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1504. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1505. Re: Chinese OCR? 1506. Re: CNS vs Big5 and my vote 1507. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1508. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1509. Big5 vs CNS in Internet newsgroups 1510. Re: CNS vs Big5 and my vote 1511. Re: A possible committee member 1512. ChineseStar and ChinesePro, which is better? 1513. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1514. Re: CNS <-> Big5 conversion 1515. Big5 <--> 7-bit Big5 is simple 1516. ChinesePro-ChinaStar-TwinBridge 1517. Re: ChineseStar and ChinesePro, which is better? 1518. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1519. Re: CNS <-> Big5 conversion 1520. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1521. Re: ChinesePro-ChinaStar-TwinBridge 1522. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1523. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1524. Re: Big5 <--> 7-bit Big5 is simple 1525. Re: ChinesePro-ChinaStar-TwinBridge 1526. CNS <-> Big5 conversion 1527. Re: CNS vs Big5 and my vote 1528. Re: CNS vs Big5 and my vote 1529. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1530. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1531. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1532. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1533. Re: Big5 <--> 7-bit Big5 is simple 1534. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1535. Coming soon: 7-bit Big5! 1536. Re: Big5 <--> 7-bit Big5 is simple 1537. Re: CNS <-> Big5 conversion 1538. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1539. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1540. Re(2): Big5 or CNS ? 1541. TW users please comment on BIG5 vs CNS 7-bit code debate 1542. Re: Big5 <--> 7-bit Big5 is simple 1543. Re: Big5 <--> 7-bit Big5 is simple 1544. Re: Big5 <--> 7-bit Big5 is simple 1545. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1546. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1547. Re(2): Big5 or CNS ? 1548. I wish CNS would die and go away 1549. Re: I wish CNS would die and go away 1550. Re: Q: how get files with **.html via FTP 1551. test, sorry, please ignore this message 1552. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1553. an explanation and an example of HZ+ 1554. ** New ** B5E2/B5encode-2: a new Big5 -> 7bit Big5 representation 1555. Re: 7-bit Big5, CPU cycles, Big5 compatibility 1556. Jing-Shin, please read the a.c.t FAQ 1557. Re: I wish CNS would die and go away 1558. NJSDK, Development Tools 1559. Re: comment on Jing-Shin's latest new proposal 1560. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1561. Re: Re(2): Big5 or CNS ? 1562. Re: Big5 <--> 7-bit Big5 is simple 1563. Re: Chinese text input methods - which are the fastest? 1564. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1565. Re: Chinese text input methods - which are the fastest? 1566. ***TEST*** 1567. pen-tablet based character input system 1568. we need more HZ+ proposals :-) 1569. Re: Big5 or CNS ? 1570. Re: Regarding CWB 1.0 1571. Re: 7-bit Big5, CPU cycles, Big5 compatibility 1572. Thank you, Jing-Shin! 1573. Re: comment on Jing-Shin's latest new proposal 1574. Re: Big5 <--> 7-bit Big5 is simple 1575. Tablet-stylus character input system 1576. Re: 7-bit Big5, CPU cycles, Big5 compatibility 1577. Facts of the Microsoft PRC Windows 1578. Facts of the Microsoft PRC Windows 1579. Facts of the Microsoft PRC Windows 1580. Facts of the Microsoft PRC Windows 1581. Facts of the Microsoft PRC Windows 1582. Re: Rebuttal and Summary of Big5 transformation debate 1583. HANZIX: Introduction 1584. HANZIX: Why Hanzix? 1585. HANZIX: Goals and how to achieve tehm 1586. HANZIX: Where are we today? 1587. Multi-Media Chinese Dictionary Demo 1588. Open Question about Chinese Computing 1589. Chinese software 1590. No more proposals! Let's get down to work! 1591. CNS sucks! 1592. Re: Thank you, Jing-Shin! 1593. Re: 7-bit Big5, CPU cycles, Big5 compatibility 1594. Jing-Shin's proposals 1595. Re: Thank you, Jing-Shin! 1596. Jing-Shin's proposals, part 2 1597. Re: comment on Jing-Shin's latest new proposal 1598. Re: Chinese text input methods - which are the fastest? 1599. How many HZ+ proposals are there?