Internet Draft The Definitions of Managed Objects for the IP Network Control Protocol of the Point-to-Point Protocol 22 June 1992 Frank J. Kastenholz Clearpoint Research Corp 35 Parkwood Drive Hopkinton, Mass 01748 USA kasten@europa.clearpoint.com Status of this Memo This document is an Internet Draft. Internet Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its Areas, and its Working Groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet Drafts. Internet Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months. Internet Drafts may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is not appropriate to use Internet Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as a ``working draft'' or ``work in progress.'' Please check the 1id-abstracts.txt listing contained in the internet-drafts Shadow Directories on nic.ddn.mil, nnsc.nsf.net, nic.nordu.net, ftp.nisc.sri.com, or munnari.oz.au to learn the current status of any Internet Draft. This document will be submitted to the Internet Activities Board as a Draft Standard. This document defines an experimental extension to the SNMP MIB. Upon publication as a Draft Standard, a new MIB number will be assigned. This is a Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 working document only, it should neither be cited nor quoted in any formal document. This document will expire before 27 Dec. 1992. Distribution of this document is unlimited. Please send comments to kasten@europa.clearpoint.com. 1. Abstract This memo defines an experimental portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing the IP Network Control Protocol on subnetwork interfaces using the family of Point-to-Point Protocols[8, 9, 10, 11, & 12]. This memo does not specify a standard for the Internet community. Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 2] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 2. The Network Management Framework The Internet-standard Network Management Framework consists of three components. They are: RFC 1155 which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for describing and naming objects for the purpose of management. RFC 1212 defines a more concise description mechanism, which is wholly consistent with the SMI. RFC 1156 which defines MIB-I, the core set of managed objects for the Internet suite of protocols. RFC 1213, defines MIB-II, an evolution of MIB-I based on implementation experience and new operational requirements. RFC 1157 which defines the SNMP, the protocol used for network access to managed objects. The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of experimentation and evaluation. Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 3] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 3. Objects Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) [3] defined in the SMI. In particular, each object has a name, a syntax, and an encoding. The name is an object identifier, an administratively assigned name, which specifies an object type. The object type together with an object instance serves to uniquely identify a specific instantiation of the object. For human convenience, we often use a textual string, termed the OBJECT DESCRIPTOR, to also refer to the object type. The syntax of an object type defines the abstract data structure corresponding to that object type. The ASN.1 language is used for this purpose. However, the SMI [1] purposely restricts the ASN.1 constructs which may be used. These restrictions are explicitly made for simplicity. The encoding of an object type is simply how that object type is represented using the object type's syntax. Implicitly tied to the notion of an object type's syntax and encoding is how the object type is represented when being transmitted on the network. The SMI specifies the use of the basic encoding rules of ASN.1 [4], subject to the additional requirements imposed by the SNMP. 3.1. Format of Definitions Section 5 contains the specification of all object types contained in this MIB module. The object types are defined using the conventions defined in the SMI, as amended by the extensions specified in [5,6]. Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 4] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 4. Overview 4.1. Object Selection Criteria To be consistent with IAB directives and good engineering practice, an explicit attempt was made to keep this MIB as simple as possible. This was accomplished by applying the following criteria to objects proposed for inclusion: (1) Require objects be essential for either fault or configuration management. In particular, objects for which the sole purpose was to debug implementations were explicitly excluded from the MIB. (2) Consider evidence of current use and/or utility. (3) Limit the total number of objects. (4) Exclude objects which are simply derivable from others in this or other MIBs. 4.2. Structure of the PPP This section describes the basic model of PPP used in developing the PPP MIB. This information should be useful to the implementor in understanding some of the basic design decisions of the MIB. The PPP is not one single protocol but a large family of protocols. Each of these is, in itself, a fairly complex protocol. The PPP protocols may be divided into three rough categories: Control Protocols The Control Protocols are used to control the operation of the PPP. The Control Protocols include the Link Control Protocol (LCP), the Password Authentication Protocol (PAP), the Link Quality Report (LQR), and the Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP). Network Protocols The Network Protocols are used to move the network traffic over the PPP interface. A Network Protocol encapsulates the datagrams of a specific higher-layer Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 5] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 protocol that is using the PPP as a data link. Note that within the context of PPP, the term "Network Protocol" does not imply an OSI Layer-3 protocol; for instance, there is a Bridging network protocol. Network Control Protocols (NCPs) The NCPs are used to control the operation of the Network Protocols. Generally, each Network Protocol has its own Network Control Protocol; thus, the IP Network Protocol has its IP Control Protocol, the Bridging Network Protocol has its Bridging Network Control Protocol and so on. This document specifies the objects used in managing one of these protocols, namely the IP Network Control Protocol. 4.3. MIB Groups Objects in this MIB are arranged into several MIB groups. Each group is organized as a set of related objects. These groups are the basic unit of conformance: if the semantics of a group is applicable to an implementation then all objects in the group must be implemented. The PPP MIB is organized into several MIB Groups, including, but not limited to, the following groups: o~+ The PPP Link Group o~+ The PPP LQR Group o~+ The PPP LQR Extensions Group o~+ The PPP IP Group o~+ The PPP Bridge Group o~+ The PPP Security Configuration Group o~+ The PPP CHAP Group o~+ The PPP PAP Group This document specifies the following group: The PPP IP Group The PPP IP Group contains configuration, status, and control variables that apply to the operation of IP over PPP. Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 6] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 Implementation of this group is mandatory for all implementations of PPP that support IP over PPP. Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 7] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 5. Definitions RFCpppip-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS experimental, Counter FROM RFC1155-SMI OBJECT-TYPE FROM RFC-1212 pppIp FROM RFC-ppp TRAP-TYPE FROM RFC-1215; -- -- The PPP IP Group. -- Implementation of this group is mandatory for all -- PPP implementations that support operating IP over PPP. -- pppIpTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF PppIpEntry ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "Table containing the IP parameters and statistics for the local PPP entity." ::= { pppIp 1 } pppIpEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX PppIpEntry ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "IPCP status information for a particular PPP link." INDEX { pppIpIndex } ::= { pppIpTable 1 } PppIpEntry ::= SEQUENCE { pppIpIndex Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 8] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 INTEGER, pppIpOperStatus INTEGER, pppIpLocalToRemoteCompressionProtocol INTEGER, pppIpRemoteToLocalCompressionProtocol INTEGER, pppIpRemoteMaxSlotId INTEGER, pppIpLocalMaxSlotId INTEGER } pppIpIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER(1..2147483648) ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The value of ifIndex that identifies the entry in the ifTable that is associated with the PPP Link over which this instance of the IP network and control protocol are operating." ::= { pppIpEntry 1 } pppIpOperStatus OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER {opened(1), not-opened(2)} ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The operational status of the IP network protocol. If the value of this object is up then the finite state machine for the IP network protocol has reached the Opened state." ::= { pppIpEntry 2 } pppIpLocalToRemoteCompressionProtocol OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { none(1), vj-tcp(2) } ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 9] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 "The IP compression protocol that the local PPP-IP entity uses when sending packets to the remote PPP-IP entity." ::= { pppIpEntry 3 } pppIpRemoteToLocalCompressionProtocol OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { none(1), vj-tcp(2) } ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The IP compression protocol that the remote PPP-IP entity uses when sending packets to the local PPP-IP entity." ::= { pppIpEntry 4 } pppIpRemoteMaxSlotId OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER(0..255) ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The Max-Slot-Id parameter that the remote node has advertised and that is in use on the link. If vj-tcp header compression is not in use on the link then the value of this object shall be 0." ::= { pppIpEntry 5 } pppIpLocalMaxSlotId OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER(0..255) ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The Max-Slot-Id parameter that the local node has advertised and that is in use on the link. If vj-tcp header compression is not in use on the link then the value of this object shall be 0." ::= { pppIpEntry 6 } Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 10] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 11] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 -- -- The PPP IP Configuration table. -- This is a separate table in order to facilitate -- placing these variables in a separate MIB view. -- pppIpConfigTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF PppIpConfigEntry ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "Table containing configuration variables for the IPCP for the local PPP entity." ::= { pppIp 2 } pppIpConfigEntry OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX PppIpConfigEntry ACCESS not-accessible STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "IPCP information for a particular PPP link." INDEX { pppIpConfigIndex } ::= { pppIpConfigTable 1 } PppIpConfigEntry ::= SEQUENCE { pppIpConfigIndex INTEGER, pppIpConfigAdminStatus INTEGER, pppIpConfigCompression INTEGER } pppIpConfigIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER(1..2147483648) ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The value of ifIndex that identifies the entry in the ifTable that is associated with the local IPCP entity." ::= { pppIpConfigEntry 1 } Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 12] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 pppIpConfigAdminStatus OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER {open(1), close(2)} ACCESS read-write STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The immediate desired status of the IP network protocol. Setting this object to open will inject an administrative open event into the IP network protocol's finite state machine. Setting this object to close will inject an administrative close event into the IP network protocol's finite state machine." ::= { pppIpConfigEntry 2 } pppIpConfigCompression OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { none(1), vj-tcp(2) } ACCESS read-write STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "If none(1) then the local node will not attempt to negotiate any IP Compression option. Otherwise, the local node will attempt to negotiate compression mode indicated by the enumerated value. Changing this object will have effect when the link is next restarted." REFERENCE "Section 4.0, Van Jacobson TCP/IP Header Compression of RFC1332." DEFVAL { none } ::= { pppIpConfigEntry 3 } END Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 13] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 6. Acknowledgements This document was produced by the PPP working group. In addition to the working group, the author wishes to thank the following individuals for their comments and contributions: Bill Simpson -- Daydreamer Glenn McGregor -- Merit Jesse Walker -- DEC Chris Gunner -- DEC Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 14] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 7. Security Considerations The PPP MIB affords the network operator the ability to configure and control the PPP links of a particular system, including the PPP authentication protocols. This represents a security risk. These risks are addressed in the following manners: (1) All variables which represent a significant security risk are placed in separate, optional, MIB Groups. As the MIB Group is the quantum of implementation within a MIB, the implementor of the MIB may elect not to implement these groups. (2) The implementor may choose to implement the variables which present a security risk so that they may not be written, i.e., the variables are READ-ONLY. This method still presents a security risk, and is not recommended, in that the variables, specifically the PPP Authentication Protocols' variables, may be easily read. (3) Using the new SNMP administrative framework[13,14], the operator can place the variables into MIB views which are protected in that the parties which have access to those MIB views use authentication and privacy protocols, or the operator may elect to make these views not accessible to any party. In order to facilitate this placement, all security-related variables are placed in separate MIB Tables. This eases the identification of the necessary MIB View Subtree. Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 15] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 8. References [1] M.T. Rose and K. McCloghrie, Structure and Identification of Management Information for TCP/IP-based internets, Internet Working Group Request for Comments 1155. Network Information Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, (May, 1990). [2] K. McCloghrie and M.T. Rose, Management Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets - MIB-2, Internet Working Group Request for Comments 1213. Network Information Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, California, (March, 1991). [3] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection - Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1), International Organization for Standardization. International Standard 8824, (December, 1987). [4] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection - Specification of Basic Encoding Rules for Abstract Notation One (ASN.1), International Organization for Standardization. International Standard 8825, (December, 1987). [5] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, Editors, Concise MIB Definitions, RFC 1212, Performance Systems International, Hughes LAN Systems, March 1991. [6] Rose, M., Editor, A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the SNMP, RFC 1215, Performance Systems International, March 1991. [7] K. McCloghrie, Extensions to the Generic-Interface MIB, RFC1229, Hughes LAN Systems, May 1991. [8] W. Simpson, The Point-to-Point Protocol for the Transmission of Multi-protocol Datagrams over Point-to- Point Links, RFC 1331, May 1992. [9] G. McGregor, The PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol, RFC 1332, Merit, May 1992. Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 16] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 [10] F. Baker, Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions for Bridging, RFC1220, ACC, April 1991. [11] PPP Authentication Protocols, Work In Progress [12] W. Simpson, PPP Link Quality Monitoring, RFC 1333, May 1992. [13] New SNMP Administrative Model, Work In Progress. [14] SNMP Security Protocols, Work In Progress. Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 17] Internet Draft PPP/IP MIB June 1992 Table of Contents Status of this Memo .................................... 1 1 Abstract .............................................. 2 2 The Network Management Framework ...................... 3 3 Objects ............................................... 4 3.1 Format of Definitions ............................... 4 4 Overview .............................................. 5 4.1 Object Selection Criteria ........................... 5 4.2 Structure of the PPP ................................ 5 4.3 MIB Groups .......................................... 6 5 Definitions ........................................... 8 6 Acknowledgements ...................................... 14 7 Security Considerations ............................... 15 8 References ............................................ 16 Frank J. Kastenholz Exp. 27 Dec. 1992 [Page 18]